2026 season, Utah Utes football

Opponent play-caller rankings

Where each opponent offensive coordinator's 2020–2025 offense ranks among the 27 FBS offensive coordinators we track: overall EPA efficiency, inside-the-20 efficiency and 3rd-down success. It describes the past; it is not a tested prediction of how a game will go.

Utah's 2026 defense is called by first-year DC Colton Swan. We have no coordinator history for him, so this board no longer rates matchups against Utah's defense.

The preseason board vs what happened

Before the season this page gave each opponent a High/Medium/Low label. We froze that board on Sept 6 and kept it. Below it sits next to the real games. The board was rebuilt after Utah's first 4 games (Idaho was not on it). The preseason board rated Arkansas High and Utah State and Iowa State Medium; all 3 were held to negative EPA per play, and Utah won each by 14 or more. Every label overstated the offense it described. That is only three games, and Utah led big in each, so the scoreboard shaped them too.

OpponentResultRealized EPA/playPreseason label (retired)
Arkansas · Tim CramseyUtah 43–10-0.069 (77 snaps)High (7/10)
Utah State · Robert AnaeUtah 33–0-0.177 (54 snaps)Medium (5/10)
Iowa State · Tyler RoehlLabelled from FCS-only data; the current board does not rank him.Utah 31–17-0.096 (73 snaps)Medium (5/10)
KansasNot played–No data
Colorado · Brennan MarionNot played–High (6/10)
Houston · Slade NagleNot played–Medium (4/10)
CincinnatiNot played–No data
BYUNot played–No data
ArizonaNot played–No data
TCUNot played–No data
West Virginia · Chad ScottNot played–Medium (5/10)

Why it was revised. In the 2026-09-06 preseason snapshot, the old “elite EPA” cutoff (0.15) sat below the average of the OCs we track (0.244), so 31 of 37 OCs cleared it and the label meant little. The old red-zone cutoff (0.10 EPA/play against a league average of 0.196) was cleared by 29 of 37 OCs, so it separated almost no one either. That red-zone measure also only covered yards-to-goal 11–20, leaving out everything inside the 10. And the style-alignment piece compared each OC to a proxy for Utah's defense (Morgan Scalley's career) when Utah's 2026 defense is called by Colton Swan. We removed the defense input, replaced fixed cutoffs and HIGH/MED/LOW labels with plain rankings among the FBS OCs we track, and now call this a description, not a forecast.

Provenance: prod-snapshot-2026-09-06-preseason.json (u-of-u repo, sha256 b5220b2ed5813db9e954ae0efbdd90413359eef8a13a074bbeebe8ee26b12e05) scored with computeThreatScore as of nektar-insights-website ffe521c (threat scoring unchanged since); schedule/slugs from threat/page.tsx at ffe521c. realized = the same computeThreatScore fed each opponent's actual 2026 game stats vs Utah (CFBD play-by-play, pipeline filters); red zone = inside the 20. Descriptive only.

  • League average: league_baselines.avg_epa for situation=overall, last refreshed 2026-08-07 (the value the preseason board compared against).
  • Red zone: zone=red_zone = yards-to-goal 11-20 only (data-pipeline src/filters.py add_field_zone: <=10 is goal_line).
  • Method: per-OC career aggregate of tendency_stats in the 2026-09-06 preseason snapshot (career rows preferred, else play-weighted stop rows), role=oc.
  • Realized figures: CFBD play-by-play for each 2026 game, filtered/enriched with data-pipeline main filters (u-of-u ledger.offense_plays); all offensive snaps.
Rankings:1st = best, among the 27 FBS OCs we track (a subset of FBS, not all ~130). Opponents are ordered by combined ranking.
Kansas logo

Kansas

Oct 10 · Home

OC: Andy Kotelnicki

57%Run%
43%Pass%
+0.307EPA/play
4,623Plays
Efficiency 1st of 27Inside the 20 3rd of 233rd down 2nd of 25

◆ Top-quartile efficiency among the FBS OCs we track

◆ Top-quartile inside-the-20 efficiency among the FBS OCs we track

Data from Buffalo, Kansas, Penn State

BYU logo

BYU

Nov 7 · Home

OC: Aaron Roderick

51%Run%
49%Pass%
+0.284EPA/play
4,928Plays
Efficiency 5th of 27Inside the 20 5th of 233rd down 9th of 25

◆ Top-quartile efficiency among the FBS OCs we track

◆ Top-quartile inside-the-20 efficiency among the FBS OCs we track

Arkansas logo

Arkansas

Sep 12 · Home

OC: Tim Cramsey

47%Run%
53%Pass%
+0.273EPA/play
3,608Plays
Efficiency 9th of 27Inside the 20 2nd of 233rd down 3rd of 25

◆ Top-quartile inside-the-20 efficiency among the FBS OCs we track

◆ Top-quartile 3rd-down success among the FBS OCs we track

Cincinnati logo

Cincinnati

Oct 31 · Away

OC: Brad Glenn

Proxy
52%Run%
48%Pass%
+0.279EPA/play
2,406Plays
Efficiency 6th of 27Inside the 20 7th of 233rd down 10th of 25

◆ Top-quartile efficiency among the FBS OCs we track

◆ Above-median inside-the-20 efficiency among the FBS OCs we track

Scheme proxy: Brad Glenn was not retained; co-OCs Pete Thomas / Nic Cardwell have no play-calling data

TCU logo

TCU

Nov 21 · Away

OC: Gordon Sammis

49%Run%
51%Pass%
+0.278EPA/play
1,712Plays
Efficiency 7th of 27Inside the 20 6th of 233rd down 15th of 25

◆ Top-quartile efficiency among the FBS OCs we track

◆ Top-quartile inside-the-20 efficiency among the FBS OCs we track

Data from UConn 2024-25

Colorado logo

Colorado

Oct 17 · Away

OC: Brennan Marion

58%Run%
42%Pass%
+0.273EPA/play
1,819Plays
Efficiency 8th of 27Inside the 20 12th of 233rd down 1st of 25

◆ Top-quartile 3rd-down success among the FBS OCs we track

◆ Above-median efficiency among the FBS OCs we track

Data from UNLV stops

Utah State logo

Utah State

Sep 19 · Home

OC: Robert Anae

46%Run%
54%Pass%
+0.222EPA/play
4,026Plays
Efficiency 17th of 27Inside the 20 13th of 233rd down 14th of 25

◆ Below-median efficiency among the FBS OCs we track

◆ Below-median inside-the-20 efficiency among the FBS OCs we track

Data from NC State/Syracuse/Virginia stops

Arizona logo

Arizona

Nov 14 · Away

OC: Seth Doege

52%Run%
48%Pass%
+0.225EPA/play
1,676Plays
Efficiency 15th of 27Inside the 20 21st of 233rd down 17th of 25

◆ Below-median efficiency among the FBS OCs we track

◆ Below-median 3rd-down success among the FBS OCs we track

Data from Marshall 2024 + Arizona 2025

West Virginia logo

West Virginia

Nov 28 · Home

OC: Rich Rodriguez

Probable play-caller
62%Run%
38%Pass%
+0.174EPA/play
2,718Plays
Efficiency 25th of 27Inside the 20 9th of 233rd down 22nd of 25

◆ Above-median inside-the-20 efficiency among the FBS OCs we track

Head coach is the probable play-caller (no OC on the staff page)

Houston logo

Houston

Oct 24 · Home

OC: Slade Nagle

56%Run%
44%Pass%
+0.187EPA/play
1,795Plays
Efficiency 24th of 27Inside the 20 19th of 233rd down 16th of 25

◆ Below-median 3rd-down success among the FBS OCs we track

◆ Bottom-quartile efficiency among the FBS OCs we track

Idaho logo

Idaho

Sep 3 · Home

OC: Ian Shoemaker

38%Run%
62%Pass%
+0.144EPA/play
1,712Plays
Efficiency 26th of 27Inside the 20 23rd of 233rd down 24th of 25

◆ Bottom-quartile efficiency among the FBS OCs we track

◆ Bottom-quartile inside-the-20 efficiency among the FBS OCs we track

Data from Hawai'i + Eastern Washington

No rating yet

Iowa State logo

Iowa State

Sep 26 · Away · OC: Tyler Roehl

FCS data from NDSU

Not rated: FCS-only data — not comparable to FBS OCsGame prep →
How the rankings work: each OC's FBS-only 2020–2025 numbers are ranked against the other FBS OCs we track (a subset of FBS, not all ~130 programs): overall EPA/play, inside-the-20 EPA/play and 3rd-down success rate. The order on this page combines the three (efficiency weighted most). We show ranks rather than HIGH/MED/LOW labels because a label reads like a forecast, and this is a description of past offense. An OC with any of the three missing, or with FCS-only data, is not ranked (the reason is shown). No defense enters it. Proxy and probable play-callers are labelled because their data may not match who calls plays in 2026.