Game Prep

Side-by-side: opponent OC tendencies vs. what Utah's defense has faced — identify where they'll attack and where the Utes have leverage.

vs. Utah Defense (Swan scheme proxy)

McGiven — Utah Offense (Self-Scout)

Full profile →

Run %45%

Pass %55%

EPA/play+0.217

3rd & Long84% pass

2-Min54% pass

These are McGiven's documented habits — what opposing DCs will prep for.

Tyler Roehl

Iowa State · — offensive plays

No tendency data for this OC yet.

python data-pipeline/src/ingest.py --oc tyler-roehl

Utah Defense — Swan Scheme Proxy

Scalley era 2020–2025 · 4,391 plays allowed · Swan coached LBs in this system

Scheme proxy: Colton Swan (DC 2026–present) has no FBS DC data yet. Swan coached Utah's linebackers under Scalley 2019–2025 — he built his career within this exact defensive system and is expected to maintain scheme continuity.

Run / Pass by Down

3rd Down by Distance

Run / Pass by Field Zone

EPA by Down

Game Script — How Play-Calling Shifts by Score

Run% and Pass% as the score differential changes — left = winning big, right = losing big

Year-over-Year Evolution

EPA / play

Situational Context

Post-Event Tendencies

Drive Opener by Zone

Interpretation note: Utah defense stats show what opponents ran against Scalley's defense — high run% = teams ran often vs Utah. OC tendencies reflect career habits. Matchup signals fire when an OC tendency aligns with Utah's historical vulnerabilities (🟢 exploit) or faces the defense's strengths (🔴 risk). 2020–2025 data window (6 seasons). Scheme proxy rationale: Colton Swan (current DC) coached Utah's linebackers in this system from 2019–2025 before his promotion. Scalley era data is the strongest available signal for Swan's defensive tendencies until 2026 season data is available.