Leaderboards
Colgate Raiders

Colgate Raiders

PatriotOTHER

2025-26 drought profile · 32 games played · 19-13 (59%)

Colgate Raiders ranks 2nd of 10 Patriot teams in droughts per game (1.28 dpg, below the Patriot average of 1.70). Their droughts average 3:37 (0:19 below the Patriot norm) and have allowed opponents an average of 6.4 pts per drought, contributing to 6 influenced losses in 2025-26.

Drought profile

1.28

Droughts/game

Conf avg: 1.7 · #2 of 10 in Patriot

2nd in Patriot

-0.42/game vs Patriot avg

#2 in Patriot (10 teams)

3:37

Avg duration

Conf avg: 3:54 · #1 of 10 in Patriot

-0:19 vs Patriot avg

How long cold streaks typically last

6.4

Avg drought cost

Conf avg: 7.1 · #1 of 10 in Patriot

-0.7 pts vs Patriot avg

Opponent points scored per drought

Game impact

6

Influenced losses

0 decisive/major: close losses where droughts swung the margin

12%

Timeout rate

Coach called a timeout in 5 of 41 droughts

7-6

Record w/ 2+ droughts

vs 12-7 in games with 0 to 1 droughts

Drought trend, 2025-26

Droughts per game over the season with a 3-game rolling average. Season average: 1.3 droughts/game.

When droughts happen

Shows when droughts begin in each 2-minute window throughout the game. Counts total to 41 droughts. Dashed line shows the conference average.

Half breakdown

1st half vs 2nd half: does this team adjust at halftime or get worse?

1st half
27
droughts · avg 3:36
2nd half
14
droughts · avg 3:37

Drought cost by severity

How damaging are each tier of drought? Longer droughts allow more opponent points. See if critical ones truly hurt more.

Notable (3–4 min)
32
78% of droughts
5.8 pts drought cost
Significant (4–5 min)
9
22% of droughts
8.8 pts drought cost
Critical (5+ min)
0
0% of droughts
n/a

Avg. opponent points scored during drought

Notable (3–4 min)
5.8 pts
Significant (4–5 min)
8.8 pts
Critical (5+ min)
n/a

Key takeaway

Significant droughts allow 52% more points than notable ones (8.8 vs 5.8 pts). Longer droughts cost significantly more.

Drought-ending shots

What shot finally breaks the cold streak? Zone intensity = frequency.

3-PT(22%)2-PT(59%)FT(20%)
3-pointer (9, 22%)2-pointer (24, 59%)FT (8, 20%)

Score differential by game

Every game plotted over 40 minutes: positive = team leading, negative = trailing. Hover a game in the sidebar to highlight its path through the season.

Mar 8
Lehigh Mountain Hawks@ Lehigh Mountain Hawks
L 69–76
Mar 5
Loyola Maryland Greyhoundsvs Loyola Maryland Greyhounds
W 90–77
Feb 28
Navy Midshipmen@ Navy Midshipmen
L 69–85
Feb 25
Lafayette Leopardsvs Lafayette Leopards
W 48–44
Feb 21
Loyola Maryland Greyhoundsvs Loyola Maryland Greyhounds
W 101–98
Feb 16
Boston University Terriers@ Boston University Terriers
L 58–85
Feb 14
Navy Midshipmenvs Navy Midshipmen
L 80–84
Feb 11
Holy Cross Crusaders@ Holy Cross Crusaders
W 74–70
Feb 7
Bucknell Bison@ Bucknell Bison
W 78–59
Feb 4
Army Black Knightsvs Army Black Knights
W 69–55
Jan 31
Lehigh Mountain Hawks@ Lehigh Mountain Hawks
L 76–77
Jan 28
Holy Cross Crusadersvs Holy Cross Crusaders
W 79–74
Jan 24
Boston University Terriersvs Boston University Terriers
W 80–79
Jan 21
American University Eagles@ American University Eagles
L 66–70
Jan 17
Bucknell Bisonvs Bucknell Bison
W 95–76
Jan 14
Loyola Maryland Greyhounds@ Loyola Maryland Greyhounds
W 86–80
Jan 10
Lehigh Mountain Hawksvs Lehigh Mountain Hawks
L 77–78
Jan 7
American University Eaglesvs American University Eagles
W 64–62
Jan 3
Army Black Knights@ Army Black Knights
W 76–69
Dec 31
Lafayette Leopards@ Lafayette Leopards
W 85–77
Dec 28
Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard Crimson
L 69–78
Dec 21
Florida Gators@ Florida Gators
L 60–90
Dec 10
St. Bonaventure Bonnies@ St. Bonaventure Bonnies
L 77–85
Dec 6
vs St. John Fisher Cardinals
W 94–50
Nov 30
Fordham Ramsvs Fordham Rams
W 72–62
Nov 29
vs SUNY-Oneonta Red Dragons
W 85–50
Nov 28
UAlbany Great Danes@ UAlbany Great Danes
W 69–67
Nov 20
Cornell Big Red@ Cornell Big Red
L 94–95
Nov 17
Siena Saints@ Siena Saints
W 72–69
Nov 14
Illinois Fighting Illini@ Illinois Fighting Illini
L 65–84
Nov 11
Drexel Dragonsvs Drexel Dragons
W 90–83
Nov 7
Northeastern Huskiesvs Northeastern Huskies
L 65–68
← Opponent leading← Game time →Team leading →

Game log

Notable (3-4 min)Significant (4-5 min)Critical (5+ min)
DateOpponentScore (H-A)Droughts
Mar 8Lehigh Mountain Hawks@ Lehigh Mountain HawksL 76-69
2
Mar 5Loyola Maryland Greyhoundsvs Loyola Maryland GreyhoundsW 90-77
1
Feb 28Navy Midshipmen@ Navy MidshipmenL 85-69
1
Feb 25Lafayette Leopardsvs Lafayette LeopardsW 48-44
2
Feb 21Loyola Maryland Greyhoundsvs Loyola Maryland GreyhoundsW 101-98
1
Feb 16Boston University Terriers@ Boston University TerriersL 85-58
2
Feb 14Navy Midshipmenvs Navy MidshipmenL 80-840
Feb 11Holy Cross Crusaders@ Holy Cross CrusadersW 70-74
2
Feb 7Bucknell Bison@ Bucknell BisonW 59-780
Feb 4Army Black Knightsvs Army Black KnightsW 69-55
1
Jan 31Lehigh Mountain Hawks@ Lehigh Mountain HawksL 77-76
1
Jan 28Holy Cross Crusadersvs Holy Cross CrusadersW 79-74
1
Jan 24Boston University Terriersvs Boston University TerriersW 80-79
1
Jan 21American University Eagles@ American University EaglesL 70-66
2
Jan 17Bucknell Bisonvs Bucknell BisonW 95-760
Jan 14Loyola Maryland Greyhounds@ Loyola Maryland GreyhoundsW 80-86
1
Jan 10Lehigh Mountain Hawksvs Lehigh Mountain HawksL 77-780
Jan 7American University Eaglesvs American University EaglesW 64-62
3
Jan 3Army Black Knights@ Army Black KnightsW 69-76
2
Dec 31Lafayette Leopards@ Lafayette LeopardsW 77-85
2
Dec 28Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard CrimsonL 69-78
2
Dec 21Florida Gators@ Florida GatorsL 90-60
3
Dec 10St. Bonaventure Bonnies@ St. Bonaventure BonniesL 85-77
2
Dec 6vs St. John Fisher CardinalsW 94-500
Nov 30Fordham Ramsvs Fordham RamsW 72-62
3
Nov 29vs SUNY-Oneonta Red DragonsW 85-50
1
Nov 28UAlbany Great Danes@ UAlbany Great DanesW 67-69
1
Nov 20Cornell Big Red@ Cornell Big RedL 95-94
1
Nov 17Siena Saints@ Siena SaintsW 69-72
2
Nov 14Illinois Fighting Illini@ Illinois Fighting IlliniL 84-650
Nov 11Drexel Dragonsvs Drexel DragonsW 90-830
Nov 7Northeastern Huskiesvs Northeastern HuskiesL 65-68
1

Drought-influenced losses

Close losses (≤15 pts) where droughts significantly impacted the outcome. "Drought cost" = points the opponent scores during a drought.

Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard CrimsonL 69-78Dec 28
19 pts allowed during 2 droughts (24.4% of 9-pt margin)
Significant Factor
18 pts allowed during 2 droughts (21.2% of 8-pt margin)
Significant Factor
16 pts allowed during 2 droughts (21.1% of 7-pt margin)
Significant Factor
12 pts allowed during 2 droughts (17.1% of 4-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Cornell Big Red@ Cornell Big RedL 94-95Nov 20
9 pts allowed during 1 drought (9.5% of 1-pt margin)
Minor Factor
8 pts allowed during 1 drought (10.4% of 1-pt margin)
Minor Factor

Drought killers

Players who most often ended Colgate Raiders scoring droughts in 2025-26.

1
SW
Sam Wright
50% clutchⓘ
12
2
AA
Andrew Alekseyenko
29% clutchⓘ
7
3
JC
Jalen Cox
50% clutchⓘ
6
4
BT
Ben Tweedy
25% clutchⓘ
4
5
JA
Josh Ahayere
0% clutchⓘ
4
6
KC
Kyle Carlesimo
33% clutchⓘ
3
7
CW
Cooper Wright
2
3PT
2PT
FT