Game prep
Side-by-side: opponent OC tendencies vs. what Utah's defense has faced. See where their past habits line up. Descriptive, not a prediction.
McGiven, Utah offense (self-scout)
Full profile →These are McGiven's documented habits from his earlier offenses (2020–2025).
Side by side
Their offense's past habit next to what offenses ran against Utah in the same situation. No verdict: neither record shows who wins the matchup.
Situation
Their OC
Utah defense
Overall Run/Pass
Overall Run/Pass
runs 44%
n=1,367opponents run 45% vs Utah
n=4,3783rd & Long
3rd & Long
passes 94%, 24% success rate
n=63opponents pass 80% vs Utah
n=217Red zone (11–20 yds)
Red zone (11–20 yds)
runs 48%
n=79opponents run 49% vs Utah
n=238Score: Trailing
Score: Trailing
passes 58% when trailing
n=682opponents pass 58% when trailing
n=1,715After Big Play
After Big Play
runs 63% after big gain
n=116opponents run 49% after big gain
n=4942-Min Drill
2-Min Drill
passes 77% in 2-min
n=209opponents pass 60% in 2-min
n=633Greg Stevens
Utah Tech · 1,367 offensive plays
Run / Pass by Down
3rd Down by Distance
Run / Pass by Field Zone
EPA by Down
Game script: how play-calling shifts by score
Run% and pass% as the score differential changes (left = winning big, right = losing big)
Year-over-Year Evolution
EPA per play
Situational Context
Post-Event Tendencies
Drive Opener by Zone
Utah defense: Scalley 2020–2025 (proxy)
Scalley era 2020–2025 · 4,378 plays allowed · Swan coached LBs in this system
Run / Pass by Down
3rd Down by Distance
Run / Pass by Field Zone
EPA by Down
Game script: how play-calling shifts by score
Run% and pass% as the score differential changes (left = winning big, right = losing big)
Year-over-Year Evolution
EPA per play
Situational Context
Post-Event Tendencies
Drive Opener by Zone