Leaderboards
Marist Red Foxes

Marist Red Foxes

METROOTHER

2025-26 drought profile · 30 games played · 19-11 (63%)

Marist Red Foxes ranks 6th of 13 METRO teams in droughts per game (1.73 dpg, above the METRO average of 1.73). Their droughts average 3:48 (0:05 below the METRO norm) and have allowed opponents an average of 6.8 pts per drought, contributing to 8 influenced losses (4 decisive/major) in 2025-26.

Drought profile

1.73

Droughts/game

Conf avg: 1.7 · #6 of 13 in METRO

6th in METRO

+0.00/game vs METRO avg

#6 in METRO (13 teams)

3:48

Avg duration

Conf avg: 3:53 · #8 of 13 in METRO

-0:05 vs METRO avg

How long cold streaks typically last

6.8

Avg drought cost

Conf avg: 7.3 · #2 of 13 in METRO

-0.6 pts vs METRO avg

Opponent points scored per drought

Game impact

8

Influenced losses

4 decisive/major: close losses where droughts swung the margin

40%

Timeout rate

Coach called a timeout in 21 of 52 droughts

8-9

Record w/ 2+ droughts

vs 11-2 in games with 0 to 1 droughts

Drought trend, 2025-26

Droughts per game over the season with a 3-game rolling average. Season average: 1.7 droughts/game.

When droughts happen

Shows when droughts begin in each 2-minute window throughout the game. Counts total to 52 droughts. Dashed line shows the conference average.

Half breakdown

1st half vs 2nd half: does this team adjust at halftime or get worse?

1st half
31
droughts · avg 3:50
2nd half
21
droughts · avg 3:45

Drought cost by severity

How damaging are each tier of drought? Longer droughts allow more opponent points. See if critical ones truly hurt more.

Notable (3–4 min)
38
73% of droughts
6.2 pts drought cost
Significant (4–5 min)
10
19% of droughts
7.7 pts drought cost
Critical (5+ min)
4
8% of droughts
9.5 pts drought cost

Avg. opponent points scored during drought

Notable (3–4 min)
6.2 pts
Significant (4–5 min)
7.7 pts
Critical (5+ min)
9.5 pts

Key takeaway

Critical droughts allow 53% more points than notable ones (9.5 vs 6.2 pts). Longer droughts cost significantly more.

Drought-ending shots

What shot finally breaks the cold streak? Zone intensity = frequency.

3-PT(13%)2-PT(60%)FT(27%)
3-pointer (7, 13%)2-pointer (31, 60%)FT (14, 27%)

Score differential by game

Every game plotted over 40 minutes: positive = team leading, negative = trailing. Hover a game in the sidebar to highlight its path through the season.

Mar 8
Merrimack Warriors@ Merrimack Warriors
L 57–58
Mar 7
Quinnipiac Bobcats@ Quinnipiac Bobcats
W 77–75
Mar 1
Saint Peter's Peacocksvs Saint Peter's Peacocks
L 56–63
Feb 22
Sacred Heart Pioneersvs Sacred Heart Pioneers
W 65–63
Feb 20
Manhattan Jaspers@ Manhattan Jaspers
W 84–70
Feb 15
Siena Saintsvs Siena Saints
L 63–67
Feb 12
Merrimack Warriors@ Merrimack Warriors
L 56–81
Feb 7
Fairfield Stags@ Fairfield Stags
L 60–63
Feb 5
Rider Broncsvs Rider Broncs
W 81–52
Feb 1
Niagara Purple Eagles@ Niagara Purple Eagles
W 58–46
Jan 30
Canisius Golden Griffins@ Canisius Golden Griffins
W 88–86
Jan 24
Quinnipiac Bobcatsvs Quinnipiac Bobcats
W 71–64
Jan 22
Siena Saints@ Siena Saints
L 50–69
Jan 19
Merrimack Warriorsvs Merrimack Warriors
L 55–68
Jan 17
Fairfield Stagsvs Fairfield Stags
W 82–67
Jan 11
Rider Broncs@ Rider Broncs
W 71–49
Jan 9
Sacred Heart Pioneers@ Sacred Heart Pioneers
W 76–72
Jan 4
Iona Gaelsvs Iona Gaels
W 83–38
Jan 2
Saint Peter's Peacocks@ Saint Peter's Peacocks
L 59–69
Dec 29
Quinnipiac Bobcats@ Quinnipiac Bobcats
L 58–64
Dec 21
Stony Brook Seawolvesvs Stony Brook Seawolves
W 70–51
Dec 16
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets@ Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
L 76–87
Dec 13
Bryant Bulldogs@ Bryant Bulldogs
W 82–74
Dec 7
Manhattan Jaspersvs Manhattan Jaspers
W 80–68
Dec 5
Mount St. Mary's Mountaineersvs Mount St. Mary's Mountaineers
W 64–56
Nov 25
Lehigh Mountain Hawksvs Lehigh Mountain Hawks
W 78–55
Nov 21
Army Black Knightsvs Army Black Knights
W 76–65
Nov 16
Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard Crimson
L 54–56
Nov 12
vs Vassar Brewers
W 93–61
Nov 9
Dartmouth Big Green@ Dartmouth Big Green
W 75–56
← Opponent leading← Game time →Team leading →

Game log

Notable (3-4 min)Significant (4-5 min)Critical (5+ min)
DateOpponentScore (H-A)Droughts
Mar 8Merrimack Warriors@ Merrimack WarriorsL 58-57
2
Mar 7Quinnipiac Bobcats@ Quinnipiac BobcatsW 75-77
3
Mar 1Saint Peter's Peacocksvs Saint Peter's PeacocksL 56-63
3
Feb 22Sacred Heart Pioneersvs Sacred Heart PioneersW 65-63
3
Feb 20Manhattan Jaspers@ Manhattan JaspersW 70-840
Feb 15Siena Saintsvs Siena SaintsL 63-67
1
Feb 12Merrimack Warriors@ Merrimack WarriorsL 81-56
4
Feb 7Fairfield Stags@ Fairfield StagsL 63-60
3
Feb 5Rider Broncsvs Rider BroncsW 81-520
Feb 1Niagara Purple Eagles@ Niagara Purple EaglesW 46-58
2
Jan 30Canisius Golden Griffins@ Canisius Golden GriffinsW 86-88
2
Jan 24Quinnipiac Bobcatsvs Quinnipiac BobcatsW 71-64
1
Jan 22Siena Saints@ Siena SaintsL 69-50
3
Jan 19Merrimack Warriorsvs Merrimack WarriorsL 55-68
3
Jan 17Fairfield Stagsvs Fairfield StagsW 82-670
Jan 11Rider Broncs@ Rider BroncsW 49-71
2
Jan 9Sacred Heart Pioneers@ Sacred Heart PioneersW 72-76
1
Jan 4Iona Gaelsvs Iona GaelsW 83-380
Jan 2Saint Peter's Peacocks@ Saint Peter's PeacocksL 69-59
2
Dec 29Quinnipiac Bobcats@ Quinnipiac BobcatsL 64-58
1
Dec 21Stony Brook Seawolvesvs Stony Brook SeawolvesW 70-51
2
Dec 16Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets@ Georgia Tech Yellow JacketsL 87-76
2
Dec 13Bryant Bulldogs@ Bryant BulldogsW 74-820
Dec 7Manhattan Jaspersvs Manhattan JaspersW 80-68
1
Dec 5Mount St. Mary's Mountaineersvs Mount St. Mary's MountaineersW 64-56
3
Nov 25Lehigh Mountain Hawksvs Lehigh Mountain HawksW 78-55
1
Nov 21Army Black Knightsvs Army Black KnightsW 76-65
3
Nov 16Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard CrimsonL 54-56
3
Nov 12vs Vassar BrewersW 93-610
Nov 9Dartmouth Big Green@ Dartmouth Big GreenW 56-75
1

Drought-influenced losses

Close losses (≤15 pts) where droughts significantly impacted the outcome. "Drought cost" = points the opponent scores during a drought.

22 pts allowed during 3 droughts (32.4% of 13-pt margin)
Major Factor
Fairfield Stags@ Fairfield StagsL 60-63Feb 7
20 pts allowed during 3 droughts (31.7% of 3-pt margin)
Major Factor
20 pts allowed during 2 droughts (23% of 11-pt margin)
Significant Factor
18 pts allowed during 3 droughts (28.6% of 7-pt margin)
Major Factor
16 pts allowed during 2 droughts (23.2% of 10-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard CrimsonL 54-56Nov 16
14 pts allowed during 3 droughts (25% of 2-pt margin)
Major Factor
13 pts allowed during 2 droughts (22.4% of 1-pt margin)
Significant Factor
8 pts allowed during 1 drought (12.5% of 6-pt margin)
Significant Factor

Drought killers

Players who most often ended Marist Red Foxes scoring droughts in 2025-26.

1
RB
Rhyjon Blackwell
42% clutchⓘ
12
2
JM
Justin Menard
44% clutchⓘ
9
3
PK
Parby Kabamba
40% clutchⓘ
5
4
JC
Jadin Collins-Roberts
40% clutchⓘ
5
5
JD
Jaden Daughtry
0% clutchⓘ
4
6
JS
Jason Schofield
25% clutchⓘ
4
7
MP
Myles Parker
33% clutchⓘ
3
8
JG
Jordan Gabriel
67% clutchⓘ
3
9
EL
Elijah Lewis
2
10
TS
Trace Salton
2
3PT
2PT
FT