Leaderboards
Harvard Crimson

Harvard Crimson

Ivy LeagueOTHER

2025-26 drought profile · 29 games played · 17-12 (59%)

Compare vs another team

Harvard Crimson ranks 7th of 8 Ivy League teams in droughts per game (1.79 dpg, above the Ivy League average of 1.38). Their droughts average 3:46 (0:07 below the Ivy League norm) and have allowed opponents an average of 6.7 pts per drought, contributing to 7 influenced losses (2 decisive/major) in 2025-26.

Drought profile

1.79

Droughts/game

Conf avg: 1.4 · #7 of 8 in Ivy League

7th in Ivy League

+0.41/game vs Ivy League avg

#7 in Ivy League (8 teams)

3:46

Avg duration

Conf avg: 3:52 · #3 of 8 in Ivy League

-0:07 vs Ivy League avg

How long cold streaks typically last

6.7

Avg drought cost

Conf avg: 7.0 · #3 of 8 in Ivy League

-0.3 pts vs Ivy League avg

Opponent points scored per drought

Game impact

7

Influenced losses

2 decisive/major: close losses where droughts swung the margin

15%

Timeout rate

Coach called a timeout in 8 of 52 droughts

7-9

Record w/ 2+ droughts

vs 10-3 in games with 0 to 1 droughts

Drought trend, 2025-26

Droughts per game over the season with a 3-game rolling average. Season average: 1.8 droughts/game.

When droughts happen

Shows when droughts begin in each 2-minute window throughout the game. Counts total to 52 droughts. Dashed line shows the conference average.

Half breakdown

1st half vs 2nd half: does this team adjust at halftime or get worse?

1st half
36
droughts · avg 3:42
2nd half
16
droughts · avg 3:55

Drought cost by severity

How damaging are each tier of drought? Longer droughts allow more opponent points. See if critical ones truly hurt more.

Notable (3–4 min)
37
71% of droughts
5.9 pts drought cost
Significant (4–5 min)
9
17% of droughts
7.4 pts drought cost
Critical (5+ min)
6
12% of droughts
10.3 pts drought cost

Avg. opponent points scored during drought

Notable (3–4 min)
5.9 pts
Significant (4–5 min)
7.4 pts
Critical (5+ min)
10.3 pts

Key takeaway

Critical droughts allow 75% more points than notable ones (10.3 vs 5.9 pts). Longer droughts cost significantly more.

Drought-ending shots

What shot finally breaks the cold streak? Zone intensity = frequency.

3-PT(29%)2-PT(58%)FT(13%)
3-pointer (15, 29%)2-pointer (30, 58%)FT (7, 13%)

Score differential by game

Every game plotted over 40 minutes: positive = team leading, negative = trailing. Hover a game in the sidebar to highlight its path through the season.

Mar 14
Pennsylvania Quakersvs Pennsylvania Quakers
L 60–62
Mar 6
Columbia Lionsvs Columbia Lions
W 81–71
Feb 28
Pennsylvania Quakers@ Pennsylvania Quakers
L 61–64
Feb 27
Princeton Tigers@ Princeton Tigers
W 58–56
Feb 21
Cornell Big Red@ Cornell Big Red
W 73–54
Feb 14
Yale Bulldogsvs Yale Bulldogs
L 75–76
Feb 13
Brown Bearsvs Brown Bears
W 56–53
Feb 7
Dartmouth Big Green@ Dartmouth Big Green
W 71–58
Jan 31
Yale Bulldogs@ Yale Bulldogs
W 67–65
Jan 30
Brown Bears@ Brown Bears
W 69–59
Jan 24
Cornell Big Redvs Cornell Big Red
L 79–86
Jan 19
Pennsylvania Quakersvs Pennsylvania Quakers
W 64–63
Jan 17
Princeton Tigersvs Princeton Tigers
W 87–80
Jan 10
Columbia Lions@ Columbia Lions
W 79–54
Jan 5
Dartmouth Big Greenvs Dartmouth Big Green
L 68–76
Dec 28
Colgate Raiders@ Colgate Raiders
W 78–69
Dec 23
St. John's Red Storm@ St. John's Red Storm
L 59–85
Dec 20
Holy Cross Crusadersvs Holy Cross Crusaders
W 81–53
Dec 6
Furman Paladins@ Furman Paladins
L 69–79
Dec 3
Massachusetts Minutemen@ Massachusetts Minutemen
L 71–78
Nov 29
Bryant Bulldogsvs Bryant Bulldogs
W 56–53
Nov 26
Boston College Eagles@ Boston College Eagles
L 60–73
Nov 22
Boston University Terriers@ Boston University Terriers
L 74–75
Nov 19
Penn State Nittany Lions@ Penn State Nittany Lions
L 80–84
Nov 16
Marist Red Foxes@ Marist Red Foxes
W 56–54
Nov 15
Army Black Knights@ Army Black Knights
W 75–52
Nov 11
Northeastern Huskiesvs Northeastern Huskies
L 60–77
Nov 9
New Hampshire Wildcatsvs New Hampshire Wildcats
W 86–75
Nov 7
vs MIT Engineers
W 79–50
← Opponent leading← Game time →Team leading →

Game log

Notable (3-4 min)Significant (4-5 min)Critical (5+ min)
DateOpponentScore (H-A)Droughts
Mar 14Pennsylvania Quakersvs Pennsylvania QuakersL 60-62
3
Mar 6Columbia Lionsvs Columbia LionsW 81-71
1
Feb 28Pennsylvania Quakers@ Pennsylvania QuakersL 64-61
2
Feb 27Princeton Tigers@ Princeton TigersW 56-58
1
Feb 21Cornell Big Red@ Cornell Big RedW 54-73
3
Feb 14Yale Bulldogsvs Yale BulldogsL 75-76
2
Feb 13Brown Bearsvs Brown BearsW 56-53
4
Feb 7Dartmouth Big Green@ Dartmouth Big GreenW 58-71
1
Jan 31Yale Bulldogs@ Yale BulldogsW 65-67
1
Jan 30Brown Bears@ Brown BearsW 59-69
2
Jan 24Cornell Big Redvs Cornell Big RedL 79-86
3
Jan 19Pennsylvania Quakersvs Pennsylvania QuakersW 64-63
2
Jan 17Princeton Tigersvs Princeton TigersW 87-80
2
Jan 10Columbia Lions@ Columbia LionsW 54-79
1
Jan 5Dartmouth Big Greenvs Dartmouth Big GreenL 68-76
1
Dec 28Colgate Raiders@ Colgate RaidersW 69-78
2
Dec 23St. John's Red Storm@ St. John's Red StormL 85-59
3
Dec 20Holy Cross Crusadersvs Holy Cross CrusadersW 81-53
1
Dec 6Furman Paladins@ Furman PaladinsL 79-69
1
Dec 3Massachusetts Minutemen@ Massachusetts MinutemenL 78-71
2
Nov 29Bryant Bulldogsvs Bryant BulldogsW 56-53
3
Nov 26Boston College Eagles@ Boston College EaglesL 73-60
3
Nov 22Boston University Terriers@ Boston University TerriersL 75-74
1
Nov 19Penn State Nittany Lions@ Penn State Nittany LionsL 84-80
2
Nov 16Marist Red Foxes@ Marist Red FoxesW 54-56
1
Nov 15Army Black Knights@ Army Black KnightsW 52-750
Nov 11Northeastern Huskiesvs Northeastern HuskiesL 60-77
2
Nov 9New Hampshire Wildcatsvs New Hampshire WildcatsW 86-75
1
Nov 7vs MIT EngineersW 79-50
1

Drought-influenced losses

Close losses (≤15 pts) where droughts significantly impacted the outcome. "Drought cost" = points the opponent scores during a drought.

Cornell Big Redvs Cornell Big RedL 79-86Jan 24
32 pts allowed during 3 droughts (37.2% of 7-pt margin)
Major Factor
Boston College Eagles@ Boston College EaglesL 60-73Nov 26
28 pts allowed during 3 droughts (38.4% of 13-pt margin)
Major Factor
Massachusetts Minutemen@ Massachusetts MinutemenL 71-78Dec 3
17 pts allowed during 2 droughts (21.8% of 7-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Pennsylvania Quakersvs Pennsylvania QuakersL 60-62Mar 14
13 pts allowed during 3 droughts (21% of 2-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Pennsylvania Quakers@ Pennsylvania QuakersL 61-64Feb 28
12 pts allowed during 2 droughts (18.8% of 3-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Penn State Nittany Lions@ Penn State Nittany LionsL 80-84Nov 19
11 pts allowed during 2 droughts (13.1% of 4-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Yale Bulldogsvs Yale BulldogsL 75-76Feb 14
11 pts allowed during 2 droughts (14.5% of 1-pt margin)
Significant Factor

Drought killers

Players who most often ended Harvard Crimson scoring droughts in 2025-26.

1
TB
Tey Barbour
62% clutchⓘ
13
2
RH
Robert Hinton
78% clutchⓘ
9
3
CP
Chandler Pigge
50% clutchⓘ
8
4
TI
Thomas Batties III
50% clutchⓘ
6
5
AH
Austin Hunt
20% clutchⓘ
5
6
BE
Ben Eisendrath
25% clutchⓘ
4
7
FM
Frankie Mannino
100% clutchⓘ
3
3PT
2PT
FT