Home

Saturday, December 6, 2025

Drought outlookSeason rates vs final result

Furman Paladins

High confidence

2

est. droughts

3:48

avg duration

7

pts/drought

est. 13 pts ceded/game

Final results

✓ As expected

Droughts

~2→2

+0

Pts ceded

~13→10

-3

Harvard Crimson

High confidence

3

est. droughts

3:46

avg duration

7

pts/drought

est. 20 pts ceded/game

Final results

✓ Much better than expected

Droughts

~3→1

-2

Pts ceded

~20→5

-15

Furman Paladins averages 1 droughts/game  · Harvard Crimson forces 2 opp. droughts/game

3

Total droughts

Both teams combined

2

Furman Paladins droughts

1

Harvard Crimson droughts

3:29

Longest drought

Harvard Crimson

15

Drought point swing

Total drought cost (pts)

Furman Paladins drought cost

2 droughts • 10 pts drought cost

10

Drought cost (pts)

Actual point differential change

Harvard Crimson drought cost

1 drought • 5 pts drought cost

5

Drought cost (pts)

Actual point differential change

Game timeline

All droughts

Notable (3-4 min)Significant (4-5 min)Critical (5+ min)
Furman Paladins

Furman Paladins

2
1st Halfnotable

Score: 9 → 11 · Opponent scored 5 pts

Ended by: Tom House made Jumper.

2-Pointer

3:21

5.0 pts

2nd Halfnotable

Score: 69 → 70 · Opponent scored 5 pts

Ended by: Tom House made Free Throw.

Free Throw

3:00

5.0 pts

Harvard Crimson

Harvard Crimson

1
1st Halfnotable

Score: 27 → 30 · Opponent scored 5 pts

Ended by: Ben Eisendrath made Three Point Jumper.

3-Pointer

3:29

5.0 pts