Leaderboards
Dartmouth Big Green

Dartmouth Big Green

Ivy LeagueOTHER

2025-26 drought profile · 27 games played · 11-16 (41%)

Dartmouth Big Green ranks 5th of 8 Ivy League teams in droughts per game (1.52 dpg, above the Ivy League average of 1.42). Their droughts average 3:42 (0:11 below the Ivy League norm) and have allowed opponents an average of 7.2 pts per drought, contributing to 6 influenced losses (4 decisive/major) in 2025-26.

Drought profile

1.52

Droughts/game

Conf avg: 1.4 · #5 of 8 in Ivy League

5th in Ivy League

+0.10/game vs Ivy League avg

#5 in Ivy League (8 teams)

3:42

Avg duration

Conf avg: 3:52 · #2 of 8 in Ivy League

-0:11 vs Ivy League avg

How long cold streaks typically last

7.2

Avg drought cost

Conf avg: 7.0 · #5 of 8 in Ivy League

+0.2 pts vs Ivy League avg

Opponent points scored per drought

Game impact

6

Influenced losses

4 decisive/major: close losses where droughts swung the margin

20%

Timeout rate

Coach called a timeout in 8 of 41 droughts

4-9

Record w/ 2+ droughts

vs 7-7 in games with 0 to 1 droughts

Drought trend, 2025-26

Droughts per game over the season with a 3-game rolling average. Season average: 1.5 droughts/game.

When droughts happen

Shows when droughts begin in each 2-minute window throughout the game. Counts total to 41 droughts. Dashed line shows the conference average.

Half breakdown

1st half vs 2nd half: does this team adjust at halftime or get worse?

1st half
24
droughts · avg 3:47
2nd half
17
droughts · avg 3:36

Drought cost by severity

How damaging are each tier of drought? Longer droughts allow more opponent points. See if critical ones truly hurt more.

Notable (3–4 min)
34
83% of droughts
7.2 pts drought cost
Significant (4–5 min)
3
7% of droughts
5.3 pts drought cost
Critical (5+ min)
4
10% of droughts
8 pts drought cost

Avg. opponent points scored during drought

Notable (3–4 min)
7.2 pts
Significant (4–5 min)
5.3 pts
Critical (5+ min)
8 pts

Key takeaway

Critical droughts allow 51% more points than significant ones (8 vs 5.3 pts). Longer droughts cost significantly more.

Drought-ending shots

What shot finally breaks the cold streak? Zone intensity = frequency.

3-PT(29%)2-PT(54%)FT(17%)
3-pointer (12, 29%)2-pointer (22, 54%)FT (7, 17%)

Score differential by game

Every game plotted over 40 minutes: positive = team leading, negative = trailing. Hover a game in the sidebar to highlight its path through the season.

Mar 7
Cornell Big Redvs Cornell Big Red
L 90–111
Feb 28
Princeton Tigers@ Princeton Tigers
L 61–82
Feb 27
Pennsylvania Quakers@ Pennsylvania Quakers
L 66–70
Feb 21
Columbia Lions@ Columbia Lions
W 64–63
Feb 14
Brown Bearsvs Brown Bears
L 76–79
Feb 13
Yale Bulldogsvs Yale Bulldogs
L 70–83
Feb 7
Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard Crimson
L 58–71
Jan 31
Brown Bears@ Brown Bears
W 77–70
Jan 30
Yale Bulldogs@ Yale Bulldogs
L 68–83
Jan 24
Columbia Lionsvs Columbia Lions
L 69–79
Jan 19
Princeton Tigersvs Princeton Tigers
W 71–69
Jan 17
Pennsylvania Quakersvs Pennsylvania Quakers
L 74–84
Jan 10
Cornell Big Red@ Cornell Big Red
W 102–91
Jan 5
Harvard Crimson@ Harvard Crimson
W 76–68
Jan 1
vs Elms College Blazers
W 107–43
Dec 29
Florida Gators@ Florida Gators
L 72–94
Dec 19
Sacred Heart Pioneers@ Sacred Heart Pioneers
L 63–85
Dec 16
Holy Cross Crusaders@ Holy Cross Crusaders
W 89–64
Dec 13
Boston University Terriersvs Boston University Terriers
W 77–64
Dec 9
Colorado State Rams@ Colorado State Rams
L 55–76
Dec 6
Wyoming Cowboys@ Wyoming Cowboys
L 80–93
Dec 3
New Hampshire Wildcatsvs New Hampshire Wildcats
W 69–68
Nov 29
Saint Peter's Peacocks@ Saint Peter's Peacocks
W 87–61
Nov 18
vs Maine-Augusta Moose
W 113–68
Nov 16
App State Mountaineersvs App State Mountaineers
L 77–85
Nov 12
Bryant Bulldogs@ Bryant Bulldogs
L 75–82
Nov 9
Marist Red Foxesvs Marist Red Foxes
L 56–75
← Opponent leading← Game time →Team leading →

Game log

Notable (3-4 min)Significant (4-5 min)Critical (5+ min)
DateOpponentScore (H-A)Droughts
Mar 7Cornell Big Redvs Cornell Big RedL 90-1110
Feb 28Princeton Tigers@ Princeton TigersL 82-61
3
Feb 27Pennsylvania Quakers@ Pennsylvania QuakersL 70-66
3
Feb 21Columbia Lions@ Columbia LionsW 63-64
1
Feb 14Brown Bearsvs Brown BearsL 76-79
1
Feb 13Yale Bulldogsvs Yale BulldogsL 70-83
1
Feb 7Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard CrimsonL 58-71
4
Jan 31Brown Bears@ Brown BearsW 70-77
2
Jan 30Yale Bulldogs@ Yale BulldogsL 83-68
2
Jan 24Columbia Lionsvs Columbia LionsL 69-79
2
Jan 19Princeton Tigersvs Princeton TigersW 71-69
2
Jan 17Pennsylvania Quakersvs Pennsylvania QuakersL 74-840
Jan 10Cornell Big Red@ Cornell Big RedW 91-1020
Jan 5Harvard Crimson@ Harvard CrimsonW 68-760
Jan 1vs Elms College BlazersW 107-43
2
Dec 29Florida Gators@ Florida GatorsL 94-72
1
Dec 19Sacred Heart Pioneers@ Sacred Heart PioneersL 85-63
4
Dec 16Holy Cross Crusaders@ Holy Cross CrusadersW 64-89
1
Dec 13Boston University Terriersvs Boston University TerriersW 77-64
1
Dec 9Colorado State Rams@ Colorado State RamsL 76-55
3
Dec 6Wyoming Cowboys@ Wyoming CowboysL 93-80
1
Dec 3New Hampshire Wildcatsvs New Hampshire WildcatsW 69-68
2
Nov 29Saint Peter's Peacocks@ Saint Peter's PeacocksW 61-870
Nov 18vs Maine-Augusta MooseW 113-680
Nov 16App State Mountaineersvs App State MountaineersL 77-85
3
Nov 12Bryant Bulldogs@ Bryant BulldogsL 82-750
Nov 9Marist Red Foxesvs Marist Red FoxesL 56-75
2

Drought-influenced losses

Close losses (≤15 pts) where droughts significantly impacted the outcome. "Drought cost" = points the opponent scores during a drought.

29 pts allowed during 3 droughts (34.1% of 8-pt margin)
Major Factor
Columbia Lionsvs Columbia LionsL 69-79Jan 24
21 pts allowed during 2 droughts (26.6% of 10-pt margin)
Major Factor
Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard CrimsonL 58-71Feb 7
19 pts allowed during 4 droughts (26.8% of 13-pt margin)
Major Factor
18 pts allowed during 3 droughts (25.7% of 4-pt margin)
Major Factor
Yale Bulldogs@ Yale BulldogsL 68-83Jan 30
16 pts allowed during 2 droughts (19.3% of 15-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Wyoming Cowboys@ Wyoming CowboysL 80-93Dec 6
8 pts allowed during 1 drought (8.6% of 13-pt margin)
Minor Factor

Drought killers

Players who most often ended Dartmouth Big Green scoring droughts in 2025-26.

1
KT
Kareem Thomas
17% clutchⓘ
12
2
JW
Jayden Williams
29% clutchⓘ
7
3
BM
Brandon Mitchell-Day
17% clutchⓘ
6
4
CM
Cameron McNamee
0% clutchⓘ
5
5
CA
Connor Amundsen
0% clutchⓘ
3
6
JM
Jackson Munro
2
7
NA
Nikola Abusara
2
3PT
2PT
FT