Leaderboards
Cornell Big Red

Cornell Big Red

Ivy LeagueOTHER

2025-26 drought profile · 28 games played · 15-13 (54%)

Compare vs another team

Cornell Big Red ranks 2nd of 8 Ivy League teams in droughts per game (0.96 dpg, below the Ivy League average of 1.50). Their droughts average 3:40 (0:14 below the Ivy League norm) and have allowed opponents an average of 7.8 pts per drought, contributing to 4 influenced losses (1 decisive/major) in 2025-26.

Drought profile

0.96

Droughts/game

Conf avg: 1.4 · #2 of 8 in Ivy League

2nd in Ivy League

-0.54/game vs Ivy League avg

#2 in Ivy League (8 teams)

3:40

Avg duration

Conf avg: 3:52 · #1 of 8 in Ivy League

-0:14 vs Ivy League avg

How long cold streaks typically last

7.8

Avg drought cost

Conf avg: 7.0 · #8 of 8 in Ivy League

+0.9 pts vs Ivy League avg

Opponent points scored per drought

Game impact

4

Influenced losses

1 decisive/major: close losses where droughts swung the margin

30%

Timeout rate

Coach called a timeout in 8 of 27 droughts

2-6

Record w/ 2+ droughts

vs 13-7 in games with 0 to 1 droughts

Drought trend, 2025-26

Droughts per game over the season with a 3-game rolling average. Season average: 1.0 droughts/game.

When droughts happen

Shows when droughts begin in each 2-minute window throughout the game. Counts total to 27 droughts. Dashed line shows the conference average.

Half breakdown

1st half vs 2nd half: does this team adjust at halftime or get worse?

1st half
13
droughts · avg 3:41
2nd half
14
droughts · avg 3:38

Drought cost by severity

How damaging are each tier of drought? Longer droughts allow more opponent points. See if critical ones truly hurt more.

Notable (3–4 min)
21
78% of droughts
7 pts drought cost
Significant (4–5 min)
6
22% of droughts
10.3 pts drought cost
Critical (5+ min)
0
0% of droughts
n/a

Avg. opponent points scored during drought

Notable (3–4 min)
7 pts
Significant (4–5 min)
10.3 pts
Critical (5+ min)
n/a

Key takeaway

Significant droughts allow 47% more points than notable ones (10.3 vs 7 pts). Longer droughts cost significantly more.

Drought-ending shots

What shot finally breaks the cold streak? Zone intensity = frequency.

3-PT(22%)2-PT(52%)FT(26%)
3-pointer (6, 22%)2-pointer (14, 52%)FT (7, 26%)

Score differential by game

Every game plotted over 40 minutes: positive = team leading, negative = trailing. Hover a game in the sidebar to highlight its path through the season.

Mar 14
Yale Bulldogs@ Yale Bulldogs
L 76–88
Mar 7
Dartmouth Big Green@ Dartmouth Big Green
W 111–90
Feb 28
Brown Bearsvs Brown Bears
W 86–80
Feb 27
Yale Bulldogsvs Yale Bulldogs
W 72–69
Feb 21
Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard Crimson
L 54–73
Feb 14
Pennsylvania Quakers@ Pennsylvania Quakers
L 76–82
Feb 13
Princeton Tigers@ Princeton Tigers
W 89–65
Feb 7
Columbia Lions@ Columbia Lions
W 88–67
Jan 31
Pennsylvania Quakersvs Pennsylvania Quakers
L 81–91
Jan 30
Princeton Tigersvs Princeton Tigers
W 87–64
Jan 24
Harvard Crimson@ Harvard Crimson
W 86–79
Jan 19
Brown Bears@ Brown Bears
W 89–67
Jan 17
Yale Bulldogs@ Yale Bulldogs
L 68–102
Jan 10
Dartmouth Big Greenvs Dartmouth Big Green
L 91–102
Jan 5
Columbia Lionsvs Columbia Lions
L 99–104
Jan 2
vs Alfred State Pioneers
W 133–65
Dec 29
Michigan State Spartans@ Michigan State Spartans
L 97–114
Dec 21
UAlbany Great Danes@ UAlbany Great Danes
W 83–75
Dec 7
Samford Bulldogs@ Samford Bulldogs
L 90–93
Dec 3
Towson Tigers@ Towson Tigers
L 80–93
Dec 2
George Mason Patriots@ George Mason Patriots
L 81–99
Nov 30
Bucknell Bison@ Bucknell Bison
W 101–72
Nov 26
vs Misericordia Cougars
W 114–70
Nov 20
Colgate Raidersvs Colgate Raiders
W 95–94
Nov 18
Army Black Knightsvs Army Black Knights
W 86–73
Nov 13
Lafayette Leopards@ Lafayette Leopards
W 97–78
Nov 9
Illinois State Redbirds@ Illinois State Redbirds
L 65–76
Nov 7
Kent State Golden Flashes@ Kent State Golden Flashes
L 102–110
← Opponent leading← Game time →Team leading →

Game log

Notable (3-4 min)Significant (4-5 min)Critical (5+ min)
DateOpponentScore (H-A)Droughts
Mar 14Yale Bulldogs@ Yale BulldogsL 88-76
2
Mar 7Dartmouth Big Green@ Dartmouth Big GreenW 90-1110
Feb 28Brown Bearsvs Brown BearsW 86-800
Feb 27Yale Bulldogsvs Yale BulldogsW 72-69
3
Feb 21Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard CrimsonL 54-73
3
Feb 14Pennsylvania Quakers@ Pennsylvania QuakersL 82-76
1
Feb 13Princeton Tigers@ Princeton TigersW 65-890
Feb 7Columbia Lions@ Columbia LionsW 67-880
Jan 31Pennsylvania Quakersvs Pennsylvania QuakersL 81-91
2
Jan 30Princeton Tigersvs Princeton TigersW 87-64
1
Jan 24Harvard Crimson@ Harvard CrimsonW 79-86
2
Jan 19Brown Bears@ Brown BearsW 67-89
1
Jan 17Yale Bulldogs@ Yale BulldogsL 102-68
2
Jan 10Dartmouth Big Greenvs Dartmouth Big GreenL 91-1020
Jan 5Columbia Lionsvs Columbia LionsL 99-1040
Jan 2vs Alfred State PioneersW 133-650
Dec 29Michigan State Spartans@ Michigan State SpartansL 114-97
1
Dec 21UAlbany Great Danes@ UAlbany Great DanesW 75-83
1
Dec 7Samford Bulldogs@ Samford BulldogsL 93-900
Dec 3Towson Tigers@ Towson TigersL 93-80
1
Dec 2George Mason Patriots@ George Mason PatriotsL 99-81
2
Nov 30Bucknell Bison@ Bucknell BisonW 72-1010
Nov 26vs Misericordia CougarsW 114-700
Nov 20Colgate Raidersvs Colgate RaidersW 95-94
1
Nov 18Army Black Knightsvs Army Black KnightsW 86-730
Nov 13Lafayette Leopards@ Lafayette LeopardsW 78-970
Nov 9Illinois State Redbirds@ Illinois State RedbirdsL 76-65
3
Nov 7Kent State Golden Flashes@ Kent State Golden FlashesL 110-102
1

Drought-influenced losses

Close losses (≤15 pts) where droughts significantly impacted the outcome. "Drought cost" = points the opponent scores during a drought.

Illinois State Redbirds@ Illinois State RedbirdsL 65-76Nov 9
28 pts allowed during 3 droughts (36.8% of 11-pt margin)
Major Factor
Pennsylvania Quakersvs Pennsylvania QuakersL 81-91Jan 31
19 pts allowed during 2 droughts (20.9% of 10-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Yale Bulldogs@ Yale BulldogsL 76-88Mar 14
15 pts allowed during 2 droughts (17% of 12-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Towson Tigers@ Towson TigersL 80-93Dec 3
8 pts allowed during 1 drought (8.6% of 13-pt margin)
Minor Factor

Drought killers

Players who most often ended Cornell Big Red scoring droughts in 2025-26.

1
CN
Cooper Noard
38% clutchⓘ
8
2
AH
Adam Hinton
0% clutchⓘ
5
3
JB
Jacob Beccles
0% clutchⓘ
3
4
AN
Anthony Nimani
33% clutchⓘ
3
5
JF
Jake Fiegen
100% clutchⓘ
3
6
KS
Kaspar Sepp
2
7
MR
Mateen Rafiq
2
3PT
2PT
FT