Leaderboards
Weber State Wildcats

Weber State Wildcats

Big SkyOTHER

2025-26 drought profile · 31 games played · 15-16 (48%)

Compare vs another team

Weber State Wildcats ranks 7th of 11 Big Sky teams in droughts per game (1.26 dpg, above the Big Sky average of 1.24). Their droughts average 3:36 (0:18 below the Big Sky norm) and have allowed opponents an average of 7.9 pts per drought, contributing to 6 influenced losses (1 decisive/major) in 2025-26.

Drought profile

1.26

Droughts/game

Conf avg: 1.2 · #7 of 11 in Big Sky

7th in Big Sky

+0.02/game vs Big Sky avg

#7 in Big Sky (11 teams)

3:36

Avg duration

Conf avg: 3:52 · #1 of 11 in Big Sky

-0:18 vs Big Sky avg

How long cold streaks typically last

7.9

Avg drought cost

Conf avg: 7.3 · #8 of 11 in Big Sky

+0.6 pts vs Big Sky avg

Opponent points scored per drought

Game impact

6

Influenced losses

1 decisive/major: close losses where droughts swung the margin

18%

Timeout rate

Coach called a timeout in 7 of 39 droughts

4-6

Record w/ 2+ droughts

vs 11-10 in games with 0 to 1 droughts

Drought trend, 2025-26

Droughts per game over the season with a 3-game rolling average. Season average: 1.3 droughts/game.

When droughts happen

Shows when droughts begin in each 2-minute window throughout the game. Counts total to 39 droughts. Dashed line shows the conference average.

Half breakdown

1st half vs 2nd half: does this team adjust at halftime or get worse?

1st half
24
droughts · avg 3:43
2nd half
15
droughts · avg 3:25

Drought cost by severity

How damaging are each tier of drought? Longer droughts allow more opponent points. See if critical ones truly hurt more.

Notable (3–4 min)
34
87% of droughts
7.2 pts drought cost
Significant (4–5 min)
2
5% of droughts
10.5 pts drought cost
Critical (5+ min)
3
8% of droughts
13.7 pts drought cost

Avg. opponent points scored during drought

Notable (3–4 min)
7.2 pts
Significant (4–5 min)
10.5 pts
Critical (5+ min)
13.7 pts

Key takeaway

Critical droughts allow 90% more points than notable ones (13.7 vs 7.2 pts). Longer droughts cost significantly more.

Drought-ending shots

What shot finally breaks the cold streak? Zone intensity = frequency.

3-PT(15%)2-PT(62%)FT(23%)
3-pointer (6, 15%)2-pointer (24, 62%)FT (9, 23%)

Score differential by game

Every game plotted over 40 minutes: positive = team leading, negative = trailing. Hover a game in the sidebar to highlight its path through the season.

Mar 9
Eastern Washington Eagles@ Eastern Washington Eagles
L 79–84
Mar 2
Portland State Vikings@ Portland State Vikings
L 60–84
Feb 28
Idaho State Bengals@ Idaho State Bengals
W 83–73
Feb 21
Montana Grizzliesvs Montana Grizzlies
W 92–72
Feb 19
Montana State Bobcatsvs Montana State Bobcats
W 82–79
Feb 14
Eastern Washington Eagles@ Eastern Washington Eagles
L 66–84
Feb 12
Idaho Vandals@ Idaho Vandals
W 83–72
Feb 7
Northern Arizona Lumberjacksvs Northern Arizona Lumberjacks
W 72–53
Feb 5
Northern Colorado Bearsvs Northern Colorado Bears
L 74–88
Feb 2
Sacramento State Hornets@ Sacramento State Hornets
L 90–104
Jan 31
Idaho State Bengalsvs Idaho State Bengals
W 81–79
Jan 24
Montana State Bobcats@ Montana State Bobcats
L 88–91
Jan 22
Montana Grizzlies@ Montana Grizzlies
L 65–81
Jan 17
Idaho Vandalsvs Idaho Vandals
L 67–75
Jan 15
Eastern Washington Eaglesvs Eastern Washington Eagles
W 91–80
Jan 10
Northern Colorado Bears@ Northern Colorado Bears
W 76–71
Jan 8
Northern Arizona Lumberjacks@ Northern Arizona Lumberjacks
W 78–65
Jan 3
Sacramento State Hornetsvs Sacramento State Hornets
W 95–82
Jan 1
Portland State Vikingsvs Portland State Vikings
L 90–95
Dec 22
vs Lincoln University (CA) Oaklanders
W 103–64
Dec 20
Utah Tech Trailblazersvs Utah Tech Trailblazers
L 80–82
Dec 17
Utah Valley Wolverines@ Utah Valley Wolverines
L 74–90
Dec 10
Kansas City Roos@ Kansas City Roos
W 64–60
Dec 7
St. Thomas-Minnesota Tommies@ St. Thomas-Minnesota Tommies
L 65–88
Dec 3
Oral Roberts Golden Eaglesvs Oral Roberts Golden Eagles
W 92–66
Nov 29
Kansas City Roosvs Kansas City Roos
W 82–61
Nov 22
UT Arlington Mavericksvs UT Arlington Mavericks
L 73–74
Nov 19
Campbell Fighting Camelsvs Campbell Fighting Camels
W 91–85
Nov 15
UC Irvine Anteaters@ UC Irvine Anteaters
L 70–79
Nov 12
Utah State Aggies@ Utah State Aggies
L 73–83
Nov 8
Utah Utes@ Utah Utes
L 89–92
← Opponent leading← Game time →Team leading →

Game log

Notable (3-4 min)Significant (4-5 min)Critical (5+ min)
DateOpponentScore (H-A)Droughts
Mar 9Eastern Washington Eagles@ Eastern Washington EaglesL 84-79
1
Mar 2Portland State Vikings@ Portland State VikingsL 84-60
3
Feb 28Idaho State Bengals@ Idaho State BengalsW 73-830
Feb 21Montana Grizzliesvs Montana GrizzliesW 92-720
Feb 19Montana State Bobcatsvs Montana State BobcatsW 82-79
1
Feb 14Eastern Washington Eagles@ Eastern Washington EaglesL 84-66
3
Feb 12Idaho Vandals@ Idaho VandalsW 72-83
1
Feb 7Northern Arizona Lumberjacksvs Northern Arizona LumberjacksW 72-53
1
Feb 5Northern Colorado Bearsvs Northern Colorado BearsL 74-88
2
Feb 2Sacramento State Hornets@ Sacramento State HornetsL 104-90
1
Jan 31Idaho State Bengalsvs Idaho State BengalsW 81-79
2
Jan 24Montana State Bobcats@ Montana State BobcatsL 91-88
1
Jan 22Montana Grizzlies@ Montana GrizzliesL 81-65
1
Jan 17Idaho Vandalsvs Idaho VandalsL 67-750
Jan 15Eastern Washington Eaglesvs Eastern Washington EaglesW 91-80
1
Jan 10Northern Colorado Bears@ Northern Colorado BearsW 71-760
Jan 8Northern Arizona Lumberjacks@ Northern Arizona LumberjacksW 65-78
1
Jan 3Sacramento State Hornetsvs Sacramento State HornetsW 95-82
2
Jan 1Portland State Vikingsvs Portland State VikingsL 90-95
1
Dec 22vs Lincoln University (CA) OaklandersW 103-64
1
Dec 20Utah Tech Trailblazersvs Utah Tech TrailblazersL 80-82
3
Dec 17Utah Valley Wolverines@ Utah Valley WolverinesL 90-74
1
Dec 10Kansas City Roos@ Kansas City RoosW 60-64
3
Dec 7St. Thomas-Minnesota Tommies@ St. Thomas-Minnesota TommiesL 88-65
1
Dec 3Oral Roberts Golden Eaglesvs Oral Roberts Golden EaglesW 92-660
Nov 29Kansas City Roosvs Kansas City RoosW 82-61
2
Nov 22UT Arlington Mavericksvs UT Arlington MavericksL 73-74
2
Nov 19Campbell Fighting Camelsvs Campbell Fighting CamelsW 91-85
1
Nov 15UC Irvine Anteaters@ UC Irvine AnteatersL 79-70
1
Nov 12Utah State Aggies@ Utah State AggiesL 83-730
Nov 8Utah Utes@ Utah UtesL 92-89
2

Drought-influenced losses

Close losses (≤15 pts) where droughts significantly impacted the outcome. "Drought cost" = points the opponent scores during a drought.

Utah Tech Trailblazersvs Utah Tech TrailblazersL 80-82Dec 20
24 pts allowed during 3 droughts (29.3% of 2-pt margin)
Major Factor
Northern Colorado Bearsvs Northern Colorado BearsL 74-88Feb 5
18 pts allowed during 2 droughts (20.5% of 14-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Eastern Washington Eagles@ Eastern Washington EaglesL 79-84Mar 9
16 pts allowed during 1 drought (19% of 5-pt margin)
Significant Factor
UT Arlington Mavericksvs UT Arlington MavericksL 73-74Nov 22
14 pts allowed during 2 droughts (18.9% of 1-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Sacramento State Hornets@ Sacramento State HornetsL 90-104Feb 2
13 pts allowed during 1 drought (12.5% of 14-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Portland State Vikingsvs Portland State VikingsL 90-95Jan 1
8 pts allowed during 1 drought (8.4% of 5-pt margin)
Minor Factor

Drought killers

Players who most often ended Weber State Wildcats scoring droughts in 2025-26.

1
TJ
Tijan Saine Jr.
38% clutchⓘ
8
2
VV
Viljami Vartiainen
50% clutchⓘ
6
3
TH
Trevor Hennig
17% clutchⓘ
6
4
NB
Nigel Burris
33% clutchⓘ
6
5
MG
Malek Gomma
20% clutchⓘ
5
6
EJ
Edwin Suarez Jr.
25% clutchⓘ
4
3PT
2PT
FT