Leaderboards
Texas A&M Aggies

Texas A&M Aggies

SECP4

2025-26 drought profile · 33 games played · 21-12 (64%)

Texas A&M Aggies ranks 11th of 16 SEC teams in droughts per game (1.09 dpg, above the SEC average of 0.96). Their droughts average 4:00 (+0:14 above the SEC norm) and have allowed opponents an average of 7.6 pts per drought, contributing to 3 influenced losses (1 decisive/major) in 2025-26.

Drought profile

1.09

Droughts/game

Conf avg: 1.0 · #11 of 16 in SEC

11th in SEC

+0.13/game vs SEC avg

#11 in SEC (16 teams)

4:00

Avg duration

Conf avg: 3:47 · #15 of 16 in SEC

+0:14 vs SEC avg

How long cold streaks typically last

7.6

Avg drought cost

Conf avg: 7.5 · #9 of 16 in SEC

+0.1 pts vs SEC avg

Opponent points scored per drought

Game impact

3

Influenced losses

1 decisive/major: close losses where droughts swung the margin

31%

Timeout rate

Coach called a timeout in 11 of 36 droughts

6-5

Record w/ 2+ droughts

vs 15-7 in games with 0 to 1 droughts

Drought trend, 2025-26

Droughts per game over the season with a 3-game rolling average. Season average: 1.1 droughts/game.

When droughts happen

Shows when droughts begin in each 2-minute window throughout the game. Counts total to 36 droughts. Dashed line shows the conference average.

Half breakdown

1st half vs 2nd half: does this team adjust at halftime or get worse?

1st half
25
droughts · avg 4:01
2nd half
11
droughts · avg 3:59

Drought cost by severity

How damaging are each tier of drought? Longer droughts allow more opponent points. See if critical ones truly hurt more.

Notable (3–4 min)
23
64% of droughts
6 pts drought cost
Significant (4–5 min)
8
22% of droughts
8.4 pts drought cost
Critical (5+ min)
5
14% of droughts
13.4 pts drought cost

Avg. opponent points scored during drought

Notable (3–4 min)
6 pts
Significant (4–5 min)
8.4 pts
Critical (5+ min)
13.4 pts

Key takeaway

Critical droughts allow 123% more points than notable ones (13.4 vs 6 pts). Longer droughts cost significantly more.

Drought-ending shots

What shot finally breaks the cold streak? Zone intensity = frequency.

3-PT(25%)2-PT(44%)FT(31%)
3-pointer (9, 25%)2-pointer (16, 44%)FT (11, 31%)

Score differential by game

Every game plotted over 40 minutes: positive = team leading, negative = trailing. Hover a game in the sidebar to highlight its path through the season.

Mar 21
Houston Cougars@ Houston Cougars
L 57–88
Mar 19
Saint Mary's Gaels@ Saint Mary's Gaels
W 63–50
Mar 12
Oklahoma Soonersvs Oklahoma Sooners
L 63–83
Mar 7
LSU Tigers@ LSU Tigers
W 94–91
Mar 3
Kentucky Wildcatsvs Kentucky Wildcats
W 96–85
Feb 28
Texas Longhornsvs Texas Longhorns
L 70–76
Feb 25
Arkansas Razorbacks@ Arkansas Razorbacks
L 84–99
Feb 21
Oklahoma Sooners@ Oklahoma Sooners
W 75–71
Feb 18
Ole Miss Rebelsvs Ole Miss Rebels
W 80–77
Feb 14
Vanderbilt Commodores@ Vanderbilt Commodores
L 69–82
Feb 11
Missouri Tigersvs Missouri Tigers
L 85–86
Feb 7
Florida Gatorsvs Florida Gators
L 67–86
Feb 4
Alabama Crimson Tide@ Alabama Crimson Tide
L 97–100
Jan 31
Georgia Bulldogs@ Georgia Bulldogs
W 92–77
Jan 24
South Carolina Gamecocksvs South Carolina Gamecocks
W 92–69
Jan 21
Mississippi State Bulldogsvs Mississippi State Bulldogs
W 88–68
Jan 17
Texas Longhorns@ Texas Longhorns
W 74–70
Jan 13
Tennessee Volunteers@ Tennessee Volunteers
L 82–87
Jan 10
Oklahoma Soonersvs Oklahoma Sooners
W 83–76
Jan 6
Auburn Tigers@ Auburn Tigers
W 90–88
Jan 3
LSU Tigersvs LSU Tigers
W 75–72
Dec 29
Prairie View A&M Panthersvs Prairie View A&M Panthers
W 111–82
Dec 21
East Texas A&M Lionsvs East Texas A&M Lions
W 118–77
Dec 14
Jacksonville Dolphinsvs Jacksonville Dolphins
W 112–75
Dec 7
SMU Mustangs@ SMU Mustangs
L 80–93
Dec 2
Pittsburgh Panthers@ Pittsburgh Panthers
W 81–73
Nov 28
Florida State Seminoles@ Florida State Seminoles
W 95–59
Nov 25
Mississippi Valley State Delta Devilsvs Mississippi Valley State Delta Devils
W 120–84
Nov 21
Manhattan Jaspersvs Manhattan Jaspers
W 109–68
Nov 18
Montana Grizzliesvs Montana Grizzlies
W 86–81
Nov 14
UCF Knightsvs UCF Knights
L 74–86
Nov 9
Oklahoma State Cowboys@ Oklahoma State Cowboys
L 63–87
Nov 6
Texas Southern Tigersvs Texas Southern Tigers
W 104–70
← Opponent leading← Game time →Team leading →

Game log

Notable (3-4 min)Significant (4-5 min)Critical (5+ min)
DateOpponentScore (H-A)Droughts
Mar 21Houston Cougars@ Houston CougarsL 88-57
1
Mar 19Saint Mary's Gaels@ Saint Mary's GaelsW 50-630
Mar 12Oklahoma Soonersvs Oklahoma SoonersL 63-83
3
Mar 7LSU Tigers@ LSU TigersW 91-94
2
Mar 3Kentucky Wildcatsvs Kentucky WildcatsW 96-85
1
Feb 28Texas Longhornsvs Texas LonghornsL 70-76
1
Feb 25Arkansas Razorbacks@ Arkansas RazorbacksL 99-84
2
Feb 21Oklahoma Sooners@ Oklahoma SoonersW 71-75
2
Feb 18Ole Miss Rebelsvs Ole Miss RebelsW 80-77
2
Feb 14Vanderbilt Commodores@ Vanderbilt CommodoresL 82-69
3
Feb 11Missouri Tigersvs Missouri TigersL 85-86
1
Feb 7Florida Gatorsvs Florida GatorsL 67-86
1
Feb 4Alabama Crimson Tide@ Alabama Crimson TideL 100-970
Jan 31Georgia Bulldogs@ Georgia BulldogsW 77-920
Jan 24South Carolina Gamecocksvs South Carolina GamecocksW 92-69
1
Jan 21Mississippi State Bulldogsvs Mississippi State BulldogsW 88-68
1
Jan 17Texas Longhorns@ Texas LonghornsW 70-740
Jan 13Tennessee Volunteers@ Tennessee VolunteersL 87-82
3
Jan 10Oklahoma Soonersvs Oklahoma SoonersW 83-76
2
Jan 6Auburn Tigers@ Auburn TigersW 88-90
1
Jan 3LSU Tigersvs LSU TigersW 75-72
2
Dec 29Prairie View A&M Panthersvs Prairie View A&M PanthersW 111-820
Dec 21East Texas A&M Lionsvs East Texas A&M LionsW 118-770
Dec 14Jacksonville Dolphinsvs Jacksonville DolphinsW 112-750
Dec 7SMU Mustangs@ SMU MustangsL 93-800
Dec 2Pittsburgh Panthers@ Pittsburgh PanthersW 73-81
3
Nov 28Florida State Seminoles@ Florida State SeminolesW 59-95
1
Nov 25Mississippi Valley State Delta Devilsvs Mississippi Valley State Delta DevilsW 120-840
Nov 21Manhattan Jaspersvs Manhattan JaspersW 109-680
Nov 18Montana Grizzliesvs Montana GrizzliesW 86-810
Nov 14UCF Knightsvs UCF KnightsL 74-860
Nov 9Oklahoma State Cowboys@ Oklahoma State CowboysL 87-63
3
Nov 6Texas Southern Tigersvs Texas Southern TigersW 104-700

Drought-influenced losses

Close losses (≤15 pts) where droughts significantly impacted the outcome. "Drought cost" = points the opponent scores during a drought.

23 pts allowed during 2 droughts (23.2% of 15-pt margin)
Significant Factor
22 pts allowed during 3 droughts (26.8% of 13-pt margin)
Major Factor
14 pts allowed during 3 droughts (16.1% of 5-pt margin)
Significant Factor

Drought killers

Players who most often ended Texas A&M Aggies scoring droughts in 2025-26.

1
ZC
Zach Clemence
11% clutchⓘ
9
2
RA
Rashaun Agee
50% clutchⓘ
8
3
RG
Rylan Griffen
57% clutchⓘ
7
4
PI
Pop Isaacs
67% clutchⓘ
3
5
MH
Marcus Hill
33% clutchⓘ
3
6
RD
Rubén Dominguez
2
3PT
2PT
FT