Leaderboards
Rider Broncs

Rider Broncs

METROOTHER

2025-26 drought profile · 28 games played · 4-24 (14%)

Rider Broncs ranks 10th of 13 METRO teams in droughts per game (1.96 dpg, above the METRO average of 1.71). Their droughts average 4:00 (+0:08 above the METRO norm) and have allowed opponents an average of 7.5 pts per drought, contributing to 11 influenced losses (5 decisive/major) in 2025-26.

Drought profile

1.96

Droughts/game

Conf avg: 1.7 · #10 of 13 in METRO

10th in METRO

+0.25/game vs METRO avg

#10 in METRO (13 teams)

4:00

Avg duration

Conf avg: 3:53 · #11 of 13 in METRO

+0:08 vs METRO avg

How long cold streaks typically last

7.5

Avg drought cost

Conf avg: 7.3 · #11 of 13 in METRO

+0.3 pts vs METRO avg

Opponent points scored per drought

Game impact

11

Influenced losses

5 decisive/major: close losses where droughts swung the margin

24%

Timeout rate

Coach called a timeout in 13 of 55 droughts

1-17

Record w/ 2+ droughts

vs 3-7 in games with 0 to 1 droughts

Drought trend, 2025-26

Droughts per game over the season with a 3-game rolling average. Season average: 2.0 droughts/game.

When droughts happen

Shows when droughts begin in each 2-minute window throughout the game. Counts total to 55 droughts. Dashed line shows the conference average.

Half breakdown

1st half vs 2nd half: does this team adjust at halftime or get worse?

1st half
33
droughts · avg 3:58
2nd half
22
droughts · avg 4:04

Drought cost by severity

How damaging are each tier of drought? Longer droughts allow more opponent points. See if critical ones truly hurt more.

Notable (3–4 min)
37
67% of droughts
6.8 pts drought cost
Significant (4–5 min)
9
16% of droughts
8 pts drought cost
Critical (5+ min)
9
16% of droughts
10.3 pts drought cost

Avg. opponent points scored during drought

Notable (3–4 min)
6.8 pts
Significant (4–5 min)
8 pts
Critical (5+ min)
10.3 pts

Key takeaway

Critical droughts allow 51% more points than notable ones (10.3 vs 6.8 pts). Longer droughts cost significantly more.

Drought-ending shots

What shot finally breaks the cold streak? Zone intensity = frequency.

3-PT(22%)2-PT(53%)FT(25%)
3-pointer (12, 22%)2-pointer (29, 53%)FT (14, 25%)

Score differential by game

Every game plotted over 40 minutes: positive = team leading, negative = trailing. Hover a game in the sidebar to highlight its path through the season.

Mar 1
Siena Saints@ Siena Saints
L 61–76
Feb 27
Iona Gaels@ Iona Gaels
L 58–80
Feb 22
Niagara Purple Eaglesvs Niagara Purple Eagles
W 67–62
Feb 20
Canisius Golden Griffinsvs Canisius Golden Griffins
L 66–72
Feb 15
Sacred Heart Pioneers@ Sacred Heart Pioneers
L 75–86
Feb 13
Mount St. Mary's Mountaineersvs Mount St. Mary's Mountaineers
L 55–65
Feb 7
Merrimack Warriorsvs Merrimack Warriors
L 47–73
Feb 5
Marist Red Foxes@ Marist Red Foxes
L 52–81
Feb 1
Saint Peter's Peacocksvs Saint Peter's Peacocks
W 81–78
Jan 30
Manhattan Jaspers@ Manhattan Jaspers
L 90–95
Jan 24
Mount St. Mary's Mountaineers@ Mount St. Mary's Mountaineers
L 61–71
Jan 19
Sacred Heart Pioneersvs Sacred Heart Pioneers
L 85–105
Jan 17
Saint Peter's Peacocks@ Saint Peter's Peacocks
L 58–69
Jan 14
Iona Gaelsvs Iona Gaels
W 72–68
Jan 11
Marist Red Foxesvs Marist Red Foxes
L 49–71
Jan 9
Fairfield Stags@ Fairfield Stags
L 62–68
Jan 4
Siena Saintsvs Siena Saints
L 65–74
Dec 29
Manhattan Jaspersvs Manhattan Jaspers
L 71–74
Dec 22
VCU Rams@ VCU Rams
L 79–100
Dec 16
Delaware Blue Hens@ Delaware Blue Hens
L 57–65
Dec 9
Bucknell Bisonvs Bucknell Bison
L 38–51
Dec 7
Quinnipiac Bobcats@ Quinnipiac Bobcats
L 58–72
Dec 4
Merrimack Warriors@ Merrimack Warriors
L 66–68
Nov 25
Coppin State Eaglesvs Coppin State Eagles
L 65–68
Nov 20
Houston Cougars@ Houston Cougars
L 45–91
Nov 18
Texas Longhorns@ Texas Longhorns
L 65–99
Nov 15
vs Eastern University (PA) Eagles
W 86–54
Nov 5
Rutgers Scarlet Knights@ Rutgers Scarlet Knights
L 53–81
← Opponent leading← Game time →Team leading →

Game log

Notable (3-4 min)Significant (4-5 min)Critical (5+ min)
DateOpponentScore (H-A)Droughts
Mar 1Siena Saints@ Siena SaintsL 76-61
3
Feb 27Iona Gaels@ Iona GaelsL 80-58
2
Feb 22Niagara Purple Eaglesvs Niagara Purple EaglesW 67-62
1
Feb 20Canisius Golden Griffinsvs Canisius Golden GriffinsL 66-72
1
Feb 15Sacred Heart Pioneers@ Sacred Heart PioneersL 86-75
1
Feb 13Mount St. Mary's Mountaineersvs Mount St. Mary's MountaineersL 55-65
2
Feb 7Merrimack Warriorsvs Merrimack WarriorsL 47-73
2
Feb 5Marist Red Foxes@ Marist Red FoxesL 81-52
3
Feb 1Saint Peter's Peacocksvs Saint Peter's PeacocksW 81-78
2
Jan 30Manhattan Jaspers@ Manhattan JaspersL 95-900
Jan 24Mount St. Mary's Mountaineers@ Mount St. Mary's MountaineersL 71-61
3
Jan 19Sacred Heart Pioneersvs Sacred Heart PioneersL 85-1050
Jan 17Saint Peter's Peacocks@ Saint Peter's PeacocksL 69-58
2
Jan 14Iona Gaelsvs Iona GaelsW 72-680
Jan 11Marist Red Foxesvs Marist Red FoxesL 49-71
3
Jan 9Fairfield Stags@ Fairfield StagsL 68-62
2
Jan 4Siena Saintsvs Siena SaintsL 65-74
2
Dec 29Manhattan Jaspersvs Manhattan JaspersL 71-740
Dec 22VCU Rams@ VCU RamsL 100-79
1
Dec 16Delaware Blue Hens@ Delaware Blue HensL 65-57
3
Dec 9Bucknell Bisonvs Bucknell BisonL 38-51
4
Dec 7Quinnipiac Bobcats@ Quinnipiac BobcatsL 72-58
3
Dec 4Merrimack Warriors@ Merrimack WarriorsL 68-66
1
Nov 25Coppin State Eaglesvs Coppin State EaglesL 65-68
2
Nov 20Houston Cougars@ Houston CougarsL 91-45
5
Nov 18Texas Longhorns@ Texas LonghornsL 99-65
3
Nov 15vs Eastern University (PA) EaglesW 86-54
1
Nov 5Rutgers Scarlet Knights@ Rutgers Scarlet KnightsL 81-53
3

Drought-influenced losses

Close losses (≤15 pts) where droughts significantly impacted the outcome. "Drought cost" = points the opponent scores during a drought.

Bucknell Bisonvs Bucknell BisonL 38-51Dec 9
29 pts allowed during 4 droughts (56.9% of 13-pt margin)
Decisive Factor
20 pts allowed during 3 droughts (28.2% of 10-pt margin)
Major Factor
20 pts allowed during 3 droughts (30.8% of 8-pt margin)
Major Factor
18 pts allowed during 3 droughts (25% of 14-pt margin)
Major Factor
Fairfield Stags@ Fairfield StagsL 62-68Jan 9
18 pts allowed during 2 droughts (26.5% of 6-pt margin)
Major Factor
17 pts allowed during 2 droughts (24.6% of 11-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Siena Saintsvs Siena SaintsL 65-74Jan 4
17 pts allowed during 2 droughts (23% of 9-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Siena Saints@ Siena SaintsL 61-76Mar 1
16 pts allowed during 3 droughts (21.1% of 15-pt margin)
Significant Factor
13 pts allowed during 1 drought (15.1% of 11-pt margin)
Significant Factor
10 pts allowed during 2 droughts (15.4% of 10-pt margin)
Significant Factor
8 pts allowed during 2 droughts (11.8% of 3-pt margin)
Minor Factor

Drought killers

Players who most often ended Rider Broncs scoring droughts in 2025-26.

1
FB
Flash Burton
31% clutchⓘ
13
2
CS
Caleb Smith
18% clutchⓘ
11
3
ZC
Zion Cruz
0% clutchⓘ
8
4
SF
Shemani Fuller
0% clutchⓘ
7
5
DB
Davis Bynum
25% clutchⓘ
4
6
AC
AB Coulibaly
0% clutchⓘ
3
7
CM
Cole McCabe
0% clutchⓘ
3
8
AW
Antwan Wilson
33% clutchⓘ
3
9
DH
Daniel Helterhoff
2
3PT
2PT
FT