Leaderboards
Princeton Tigers

Princeton Tigers

Ivy LeagueOTHER

2025-26 drought profile · 29 games played · 9-20 (31%)

Compare vs another team

Princeton Tigers ranks 6th of 8 Ivy League teams in droughts per game (1.62 dpg, above the Ivy League average of 1.41). Their droughts average 3:58 (+0:06 above the Ivy League norm) and have allowed opponents an average of 7.2 pts per drought, contributing to 11 influenced losses (3 decisive/major) in 2025-26.

Drought profile

1.62

Droughts/game

Conf avg: 1.4 · #6 of 8 in Ivy League

6th in Ivy League

+0.21/game vs Ivy League avg

#6 in Ivy League (8 teams)

3:58

Avg duration

Conf avg: 3:52 · #6 of 8 in Ivy League

+0:06 vs Ivy League avg

How long cold streaks typically last

7.2

Avg drought cost

Conf avg: 7.0 · #7 of 8 in Ivy League

+0.3 pts vs Ivy League avg

Opponent points scored per drought

Game impact

11

Influenced losses

3 decisive/major: close losses where droughts swung the margin

32%

Timeout rate

Coach called a timeout in 15 of 47 droughts

3-14

Record w/ 2+ droughts

vs 6-6 in games with 0 to 1 droughts

Drought trend, 2025-26

Droughts per game over the season with a 3-game rolling average. Season average: 1.6 droughts/game.

When droughts happen

Shows when droughts begin in each 2-minute window throughout the game. Counts total to 47 droughts. Dashed line shows the conference average.

Half breakdown

1st half vs 2nd half: does this team adjust at halftime or get worse?

1st half
27
droughts · avg 3:57
2nd half
20
droughts · avg 3:58

Drought cost by severity

How damaging are each tier of drought? Longer droughts allow more opponent points. See if critical ones truly hurt more.

Notable (3–4 min)
29
62% of droughts
6.4 pts drought cost
Significant (4–5 min)
8
17% of droughts
7.1 pts drought cost
Critical (5+ min)
10
21% of droughts
9.7 pts drought cost

Avg. opponent points scored during drought

Notable (3–4 min)
6.4 pts
Significant (4–5 min)
7.1 pts
Critical (5+ min)
9.7 pts

Key takeaway

Critical droughts allow 52% more points than notable ones (9.7 vs 6.4 pts). Longer droughts cost significantly more.

Drought-ending shots

What shot finally breaks the cold streak? Zone intensity = frequency.

3-PT(26%)2-PT(51%)FT(23%)
3-pointer (12, 26%)2-pointer (24, 51%)FT (11, 23%)

Score differential by game

Every game plotted over 40 minutes: positive = team leading, negative = trailing. Hover a game in the sidebar to highlight its path through the season.

Mar 7
Yale Bulldogs@ Yale Bulldogs
L 53–78
Feb 28
Dartmouth Big Greenvs Dartmouth Big Green
W 82–61
Feb 27
Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard Crimson
L 56–58
Feb 20
Brown Bears@ Brown Bears
L 71–80
Feb 14
Columbia Lionsvs Columbia Lions
L 65–75
Feb 13
Cornell Big Redvs Cornell Big Red
L 65–89
Feb 7
Pennsylvania Quakers@ Pennsylvania Quakers
L 60–61
Jan 31
Columbia Lions@ Columbia Lions
W 80–68
Jan 30
Cornell Big Red@ Cornell Big Red
L 64–87
Jan 24
Brown Bearsvs Brown Bears
W 63–53
Jan 19
Dartmouth Big Green@ Dartmouth Big Green
L 69–71
Jan 17
Harvard Crimson@ Harvard Crimson
L 80–87
Jan 10
Yale Bulldogsvs Yale Bulldogs
W 76–60
Jan 5
Pennsylvania Quakersvs Pennsylvania Quakers
W 78–76
Dec 30
Vermont Catamountsvs Vermont Catamounts
W 75–69
Dec 22
Temple Owls@ Temple Owls
L 61–65
Dec 10
Merrimack Warriorsvs Merrimack Warriors
L 56–59
Dec 6
Loyola Chicago Ramblers@ Loyola Chicago Ramblers
L 68–73
Dec 3
Monmouth Hawks@ Monmouth Hawks
L 58–63
Nov 30
Saint Joseph's Hawksvs Saint Joseph's Hawks
L 58–60
Nov 26
Vermont Catamountsvs Vermont Catamounts
L 74–79
Nov 25
Temple Owlsvs Temple Owls
L 75–79
Nov 24
Bradley Braves@ Bradley Braves
L 64–88
Nov 20
Northeastern Huskiesvs Northeastern Huskies
W 70–57
Nov 18
Iona Gaels@ Iona Gaels
L 69–89
Nov 15
Kansas Jayhawks@ Kansas Jayhawks
L 57–76
Nov 13
vs John Jay College Bloodhounds
W 100–59
Nov 11
Bucknell Bisonvs Bucknell Bison
W 73–63
Nov 8
Akron Zips@ Akron Zips
L 69–104
← Opponent leading← Game time →Team leading →

Game log

Notable (3-4 min)Significant (4-5 min)Critical (5+ min)
DateOpponentScore (H-A)Droughts
Mar 7Yale Bulldogs@ Yale BulldogsL 78-53
3
Feb 28Dartmouth Big Greenvs Dartmouth Big GreenW 82-61
1
Feb 27Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard CrimsonL 56-58
2
Feb 20Brown Bears@ Brown BearsL 80-71
1
Feb 14Columbia Lionsvs Columbia LionsL 65-75
2
Feb 13Cornell Big Redvs Cornell Big RedL 65-89
2
Feb 7Pennsylvania Quakers@ Pennsylvania QuakersL 61-60
2
Jan 31Columbia Lions@ Columbia LionsW 68-80
1
Jan 30Cornell Big Red@ Cornell Big RedL 87-64
2
Jan 24Brown Bearsvs Brown BearsW 63-53
1
Jan 19Dartmouth Big Green@ Dartmouth Big GreenL 71-69
2
Jan 17Harvard Crimson@ Harvard CrimsonL 87-800
Jan 10Yale Bulldogsvs Yale BulldogsW 76-60
2
Jan 5Pennsylvania Quakersvs Pennsylvania QuakersW 78-76
2
Dec 30Vermont Catamountsvs Vermont CatamountsW 75-69
1
Dec 22Temple Owls@ Temple OwlsL 65-61
2
Dec 10Merrimack Warriorsvs Merrimack WarriorsL 56-59
1
Dec 6Loyola Chicago Ramblers@ Loyola Chicago RamblersL 73-68
3
Dec 3Monmouth Hawks@ Monmouth HawksL 63-58
2
Nov 30Saint Joseph's Hawksvs Saint Joseph's HawksL 58-60
2
Nov 26Vermont Catamountsvs Vermont CatamountsL 74-790
Nov 25Temple Owlsvs Temple OwlsL 75-79
2
Nov 24Bradley Braves@ Bradley BravesL 88-64
1
Nov 20Northeastern Huskiesvs Northeastern HuskiesW 70-570
Nov 18Iona Gaels@ Iona GaelsL 89-69
2
Nov 15Kansas Jayhawks@ Kansas JayhawksL 76-57
3
Nov 13vs John Jay College BloodhoundsW 100-590
Nov 11Bucknell Bisonvs Bucknell BisonW 73-63
4
Nov 8Akron Zips@ Akron ZipsL 104-69
1

Drought-influenced losses

Close losses (≤15 pts) where droughts significantly impacted the outcome. "Drought cost" = points the opponent scores during a drought.

Loyola Chicago Ramblers@ Loyola Chicago RamblersL 68-73Dec 6
22 pts allowed during 3 droughts (30.1% of 5-pt margin)
Major Factor
Temple Owlsvs Temple OwlsL 75-79Nov 25
17 pts allowed during 2 droughts (21.5% of 4-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Temple Owls@ Temple OwlsL 61-65Dec 22
17 pts allowed during 2 droughts (26.2% of 4-pt margin)
Major Factor
Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard CrimsonL 56-58Feb 27
16 pts allowed during 2 droughts (27.6% of 2-pt margin)
Major Factor
Brown Bears@ Brown BearsL 71-80Feb 20
14 pts allowed during 1 drought (17.5% of 9-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Dartmouth Big Green@ Dartmouth Big GreenL 69-71Jan 19
14 pts allowed during 2 droughts (19.7% of 2-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Monmouth Hawks@ Monmouth HawksL 58-63Dec 3
13 pts allowed during 2 droughts (20.6% of 5-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Columbia Lionsvs Columbia LionsL 65-75Feb 14
13 pts allowed during 2 droughts (17.3% of 10-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Pennsylvania Quakers@ Pennsylvania QuakersL 60-61Feb 7
12 pts allowed during 2 droughts (19.7% of 1-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Saint Joseph's Hawksvs Saint Joseph's HawksL 58-60Nov 30
10 pts allowed during 2 droughts (16.7% of 2-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Merrimack Warriorsvs Merrimack WarriorsL 56-59Dec 10
9 pts allowed during 1 drought (15.3% of 3-pt margin)
Significant Factor

Drought killers

Players who most often ended Princeton Tigers scoring droughts in 2025-26.

1
JH
Jackson Hicke
23% clutchⓘ
13
2
DD
Dalen Davis
43% clutchⓘ
7
3
JS
Jack Stanton
29% clutchⓘ
7
4
LC
Landon Clark
0% clutchⓘ
7
5
CH
CJ Happy
50% clutchⓘ
4
6
MA
Malik Abdullahi
25% clutchⓘ
4
7
JH
Jacob Hammond
2
3PT
2PT
FT