Leaderboards
Pennsylvania Quakers

Pennsylvania Quakers

Ivy LeagueOTHER

2025-26 Drought Profile · 22 games played · 17-11 (61%)

Pennsylvania Quakers ranks 2nd of 8 Ivy League teams in droughts per game (1.64 dpg, below the Ivy League average of 1.85). Their droughts average 3:54 — near the Ivy League norm — and have allowed opponents an average of 6.6 pts per drought, contributing to 5 influenced losses (2 decisive/major) this season.

Drought Profile

Droughts/Game

1.64

Conf avg: 1.8 · #2 of 8 in Ivy League

2nd in Ivy League

-0.21/game vs Ivy League avg

#2 in Ivy League (8 teams)

Avg Duration

3:54

Conf avg: 232.4 · #5 of 8 in Ivy League

+0:02 vs Ivy League avg

How long cold streaks typically last

Avg Pts Allowed

6.6

Conf avg: 7.0 · #2 of 8 in Ivy League

-0.4 pts vs Ivy League avg

Opponent points scored per drought

Game Impact

Influenced Losses

5

2 decisive/major — close losses where droughts swung the margin

Timeout Rate

8%

Coach called a timeout in 3 of 36 droughts

Record w/ 2+ Droughts

4-6

vs 13-5 in games with 0–1 droughts

Drought Trend This Season
Droughts per game over the season with a 3-game rolling average. Season average: 1.6 droughts/game.
When Droughts Happen
Shows when droughts begin in each 2-minute window throughout the game. Counts total to 36 droughts. Dashed line shows the conference average.
Half Breakdown
1st half vs 2nd half: does this team adjust at halftime or get worse?
1st Half
22
droughts · avg 3:57
2nd Half
14
droughts · avg 3:49
Drought Cost by Severity
How damaging are each tier of drought? Longer droughts allow more opponent points — see if critical ones truly hurt more.
Notable (3–4 min)
23
64% of droughts
5.7 pts allowed
Significant (4–5 min)
10
28% of droughts
7.2 pts allowed
Critical (5+ min)
3
8% of droughts
11.3 pts allowed

Avg. opponent points scored during drought

Notable (3–4 min)
5.7 pts
Significant (4–5 min)
7.2 pts
Critical (5+ min)
11.3 pts

Key Takeaway

Critical droughts allow 98% more points than notable ones (11.3 vs 5.7 pts). Longer droughts cost significantly more.

Drought-Ending Shots
What shot finally breaks the cold streak? Zone intensity = frequency.
3-PT(28%)2-PT(47%)FT(25%)
3-Ptr (10, 28%)2-Ptr (17, 47%)FT (9, 25%)
Score Differential by Game
Every game plotted over 40 minutes — positive = team leading, negative = trailing. Hover a game in the sidebar to highlight its path through the season.
Mar 14
Harvard Crimson@ Harvard Crimson
W 62–60
Mar 6
Brown Bears@ Brown Bears
W 82–61
Feb 28
Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard Crimson
W 64–61
Feb 27
Dartmouth Big Greenvs Dartmouth Big Green
W 70–66
Feb 21
Yale Bulldogs@ Yale Bulldogs
L 70–74
Feb 14
Cornell Big Redvs Cornell Big Red
W 82–76
Feb 13
Columbia Lionsvs Columbia Lions
W 76–67
Feb 7
Princeton Tigersvs Princeton Tigers
W 61–60
Jan 31
Cornell Big Red@ Cornell Big Red
W 91–81
Jan 30
Columbia Lions@ Columbia Lions
L 67–72
Jan 24
Yale Bulldogsvs Yale Bulldogs
L 60–77
Jan 19
Harvard Crimson@ Harvard Crimson
L 63–64
Jan 17
Dartmouth Big Green@ Dartmouth Big Green
W 84–74
Jan 10
Brown Bearsvs Brown Bears
W 81–73
Jan 5
Princeton Tigers@ Princeton Tigers
L 76–78
Dec 31
NJIT Highlandersvs NJIT Highlanders
W 80–61
Dec 28
George Mason Patriots@ George Mason Patriots
L 79–83
Dec 20
Rutgers Scarlet Knights@ Rutgers Scarlet Knights
L 69–70
Dec 8
Lafayette Leopardsvs Lafayette Leopards
W 74–72
Dec 6
Villanova Wildcats@ Villanova Wildcats
L 63–90
Nov 30
Hofstra Pridevs Hofstra Pride
L 60–77
Nov 29
La Salle Explorersvs La Salle Explorers
W 73–71
Nov 28
Merrimack Warriorsvs Merrimack Warriors
W 77–65
Nov 21
Drexel Dragons@ Drexel Dragons
W 84–68
Nov 17
Saint Joseph's Hawksvs Saint Joseph's Hawks
W 83–74
Nov 11
Providence Friars@ Providence Friars
L 81–106
Nov 9
American University Eagles@ American University Eagles
L 78–84
Nov 7
vs Rowan Profs
W 119–72
← Opponent leading← Game time →Team leading →
Game Log
Notable (3-4 min)Significant (4-5 min)Critical (5+ min)
DateOpponentScore (H-A)Droughts
Mar 14Harvard Crimson@ Harvard CrimsonW 60-62
3
Mar 6Brown Bears@ Brown BearsW 61-82
1
Feb 28Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard CrimsonW 64-61
2
Feb 27Dartmouth Big Greenvs Dartmouth Big GreenW 70-660
Feb 21Yale Bulldogs@ Yale BulldogsL 74-70
3
Feb 14Cornell Big Redvs Cornell Big RedW 82-76
1
Feb 13Columbia Lionsvs Columbia LionsW 76-67
3
Feb 7Princeton Tigersvs Princeton TigersW 61-60
3
Jan 31Cornell Big Red@ Cornell Big RedW 81-91
1
Jan 30Columbia Lions@ Columbia LionsL 72-67
1
Jan 24Yale Bulldogsvs Yale BulldogsL 60-77
2
Jan 19Harvard Crimson@ Harvard CrimsonL 64-63
2
Jan 17Dartmouth Big Green@ Dartmouth Big GreenW 74-84
1
Jan 10Brown Bearsvs Brown BearsW 81-730
Jan 5Princeton Tigers@ Princeton TigersL 78-76
1
Dec 31NJIT Highlandersvs NJIT HighlandersW 80-610
Dec 28George Mason Patriots@ George Mason PatriotsL 83-79
2
Dec 20Rutgers Scarlet Knights@ Rutgers Scarlet KnightsL 70-69
2
Dec 8Lafayette Leopardsvs Lafayette LeopardsW 74-720
Dec 6Villanova Wildcats@ Villanova WildcatsL 90-63
2
Nov 30Hofstra Pridevs Hofstra PrideL 60-77
1
Nov 29La Salle Explorersvs La Salle ExplorersW 73-71
1
Nov 28Merrimack Warriorsvs Merrimack WarriorsW 77-650
Nov 21Drexel Dragons@ Drexel DragonsW 68-84
1
Nov 17Saint Joseph's Hawksvs Saint Joseph's HawksW 83-74
1
Nov 11Providence Friars@ Providence FriarsL 106-81
1
Nov 9American University Eagles@ American University EaglesL 84-78
1
Nov 7vs Rowan ProfsW 119-720
Drought-Influenced Losses
Close losses (≤15 pts) where droughts significantly impacted the outcome. "Defensive cost" = points allowed during drought periods.
Yale Bulldogs@ Yale BulldogsL 70-74Feb 21
22 pts allowed during 3 droughts (29.7% of 4-pt margin)
Major Factor
George Mason Patriots@ George Mason PatriotsL 79-83Dec 28
19 pts allowed during 2 droughts (22.9% of 4-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Harvard Crimson@ Harvard CrimsonL 63-64Jan 19
17 pts allowed during 2 droughts (26.6% of 1-pt margin)
Major Factor
Princeton Tigers@ Princeton TigersL 76-78Jan 5
12 pts allowed during 1 drought (15.4% of 2-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Rutgers Scarlet Knights@ Rutgers Scarlet KnightsL 69-70Dec 20
11 pts allowed during 2 droughts (15.7% of 1-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Drought Killers
Players who most often ended Pennsylvania Quakers scoring droughts this season.
1
ER
Ethan Roberts
43% clutchⓘ
7
2
MZ
Michael Zanoni
17% clutchⓘ
6
3
TP
TJ Power
50% clutchⓘ
6
4
AL
AJ Levine
17% clutchⓘ
6
5
CT
Cam Thrower
50% clutchⓘ
4
6
JJ
Jay Jones
0% clutchⓘ
3
3PT
2PT
FT