Leaderboards
Minnesota Golden Gophers

Minnesota Golden Gophers

Big TenP4

2025-26 drought profile · 32 games played · 14-18 (44%)

Compare vs another team

Minnesota Golden Gophers ranks 17th of 18 Big Ten teams in droughts per game (1.78 dpg, above the Big Ten average of 1.32). Their droughts average 4:07 (+0:16 above the Big Ten norm) and have allowed opponents an average of 7.0 pts per drought, contributing to 11 influenced losses (2 decisive/major) in 2025-26.

Drought profile

1.78

Droughts/game

Conf avg: 1.3 · #17 of 18 in Big Ten

17th in Big Ten

+0.46/game vs Big Ten avg

#17 in Big Ten (18 teams)

4:07

Avg duration

Conf avg: 3:52 · #18 of 18 in Big Ten

+0:16 vs Big Ten avg

How long cold streaks typically last

7.0

Avg drought cost

Conf avg: 7.2 · #6 of 18 in Big Ten

-0.1 pts vs Big Ten avg

Opponent points scored per drought

Game impact

11

Influenced losses

2 decisive/major: close losses where droughts swung the margin

28%

Timeout rate

Coach called a timeout in 16 of 57 droughts

6-12

Record w/ 2+ droughts

vs 8-6 in games with 0 to 1 droughts

Drought trend, 2025-26

Droughts per game over the season with a 3-game rolling average. Season average: 1.8 droughts/game.

When droughts happen

Shows when droughts begin in each 2-minute window throughout the game. Counts total to 57 droughts. Dashed line shows the conference average.

Half breakdown

1st half vs 2nd half: does this team adjust at halftime or get worse?

1st half
34
droughts · avg 4:13
2nd half
23
droughts · avg 3:58

Drought cost by severity

How damaging are each tier of drought? Longer droughts allow more opponent points. See if critical ones truly hurt more.

Notable (3–4 min)
32
56% of droughts
5.6 pts drought cost
Significant (4–5 min)
15
26% of droughts
7.5 pts drought cost
Critical (5+ min)
10
18% of droughts
10.9 pts drought cost

Avg. opponent points scored during drought

Notable (3–4 min)
5.6 pts
Significant (4–5 min)
7.5 pts
Critical (5+ min)
10.9 pts

Key takeaway

Critical droughts allow 95% more points than notable ones (10.9 vs 5.6 pts). Longer droughts cost significantly more.

Drought-ending shots

What shot finally breaks the cold streak? Zone intensity = frequency.

3-PT(23%)2-PT(49%)FT(28%)
3-pointer (13, 23%)2-pointer (28, 49%)FT (16, 28%)

Score differential by game

Every game plotted over 40 minutes: positive = team leading, negative = trailing. Hover a game in the sidebar to highlight its path through the season.

Apr 1
Baylor Bearsvs Baylor Bears
L 48–67
Mar 11
Rutgers Scarlet Knightsvs Rutgers Scarlet Knights
L 67–72
Mar 7
Northwestern Wildcatsvs Northwestern Wildcats
W 67–66
Mar 4
Indiana Hoosiers@ Indiana Hoosiers
L 47–77
Feb 28
UCLA Bruinsvs UCLA Bruins
W 65–61
Feb 24
Michigan Wolverines@ Michigan Wolverines
L 67–77
Feb 21
Rutgers Scarlet Knightsvs Rutgers Scarlet Knights
W 80–61
Feb 17
Oregon Ducks@ Oregon Ducks
W 61–44
Feb 14
Washington Huskies@ Washington Huskies
L 57–69
Feb 8
Maryland Terrapinsvs Maryland Terrapins
L 62–67
Feb 4
Michigan State Spartansvs Michigan State Spartans
W 76–73
Feb 1
Penn State Nittany Lions@ Penn State Nittany Lions
L 75–77
Jan 28
Wisconsin Badgers@ Wisconsin Badgers
L 63–67
Jan 24
Nebraska Cornhuskersvs Nebraska Cornhuskers
L 57–76
Jan 20
Ohio State Buckeyes@ Ohio State Buckeyes
L 74–82
Jan 17
Illinois Fighting Illini@ Illinois Fighting Illini
L 67–77
Jan 13
Wisconsin Badgersvs Wisconsin Badgers
L 75–78
Jan 9
USC Trojansvs USC Trojans
L 69–70
Jan 6
Iowa Hawkeyesvs Iowa Hawkeyes
W 70–67
Jan 3
Northwestern Wildcats@ Northwestern Wildcats
W 84–78
Dec 29
Fairleigh Dickinson Knightsvs Fairleigh Dickinson Knights
W 60–43
Dec 21
Campbell Fighting Camelsvs Campbell Fighting Camels
W 78–50
Dec 14
Texas Southern Tigersvs Texas Southern Tigers
W 89–53
Dec 10
Purdue Boilermakers@ Purdue Boilermakers
L 57–85
Dec 3
Indiana Hoosiersvs Indiana Hoosiers
W 73–64
Nov 28
Santa Clara Broncos@ Santa Clara Broncos
L 75–86
Nov 27
Stanford Cardinalvs Stanford Cardinal
L 68–72
Nov 22
San Francisco Donsvs San Francisco Dons
L 65–77
Nov 18
Chicago State Cougarsvs Chicago State Cougars
W 66–54
Nov 15
Green Bay Phoenixvs Green Bay Phoenix
W 72–65
Nov 12
Missouri Tigers@ Missouri Tigers
L 60–83
Nov 8
Alcorn State Bravesvs Alcorn State Braves
W 95–50
← Opponent leading← Game time →Team leading →

Game log

Notable (3-4 min)Significant (4-5 min)Critical (5+ min)
DateOpponentScore (H-A)Droughts
Apr 1Baylor Bearsvs Baylor BearsL 48-67
4
Mar 11Rutgers Scarlet Knightsvs Rutgers Scarlet KnightsL 67-72
2
Mar 7Northwestern Wildcatsvs Northwestern WildcatsW 67-66
3
Mar 4Indiana Hoosiers@ Indiana HoosiersL 77-47
3
Feb 28UCLA Bruinsvs UCLA BruinsW 65-61
1
Feb 24Michigan Wolverines@ Michigan WolverinesL 77-67
1
Feb 21Rutgers Scarlet Knightsvs Rutgers Scarlet KnightsW 80-610
Feb 17Oregon Ducks@ Oregon DucksW 44-61
4
Feb 14Washington Huskies@ Washington HuskiesL 69-57
2
Feb 8Maryland Terrapinsvs Maryland TerrapinsL 62-67
3
Feb 4Michigan State Spartansvs Michigan State SpartansW 76-73
2
Feb 1Penn State Nittany Lions@ Penn State Nittany LionsL 77-75
1
Jan 28Wisconsin Badgers@ Wisconsin BadgersL 67-63
3
Jan 24Nebraska Cornhuskersvs Nebraska CornhuskersL 57-76
2
Jan 20Ohio State Buckeyes@ Ohio State BuckeyesL 82-74
1
Jan 17Illinois Fighting Illini@ Illinois Fighting IlliniL 77-67
2
Jan 13Wisconsin Badgersvs Wisconsin BadgersL 75-78
1
Jan 9USC Trojansvs USC TrojansL 69-70
2
Jan 6Iowa Hawkeyesvs Iowa HawkeyesW 70-67
1
Jan 3Northwestern Wildcats@ Northwestern WildcatsW 78-840
Dec 29Fairleigh Dickinson Knightsvs Fairleigh Dickinson KnightsW 60-43
3
Dec 21Campbell Fighting Camelsvs Campbell Fighting CamelsW 78-50
1
Dec 14Texas Southern Tigersvs Texas Southern TigersW 89-53
1
Dec 10Purdue Boilermakers@ Purdue BoilermakersL 85-57
3
Dec 3Indiana Hoosiersvs Indiana HoosiersW 73-64
1
Nov 28Santa Clara Broncos@ Santa Clara BroncosL 86-750
Nov 27Stanford Cardinalvs Stanford CardinalL 68-72
2
Nov 22San Francisco Donsvs San Francisco DonsL 65-77
3
Nov 18Chicago State Cougarsvs Chicago State CougarsW 66-54
2
Nov 15Green Bay Phoenixvs Green Bay PhoenixW 72-65
2
Nov 12Missouri Tigers@ Missouri TigersL 83-60
1
Nov 8Alcorn State Bravesvs Alcorn State BravesW 95-500

Drought-influenced losses

Close losses (≤15 pts) where droughts significantly impacted the outcome. "Drought cost" = points the opponent scores during a drought.

Washington Huskies@ Washington HuskiesL 57-69Feb 14
20 pts allowed during 2 droughts (29% of 12-pt margin)
Major Factor
Wisconsin Badgers@ Wisconsin BadgersL 63-67Jan 28
18 pts allowed during 3 droughts (26.9% of 4-pt margin)
Major Factor
Illinois Fighting Illini@ Illinois Fighting IlliniL 67-77Jan 17
14 pts allowed during 2 droughts (18.2% of 10-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Rutgers Scarlet Knightsvs Rutgers Scarlet KnightsL 67-72Mar 11
14 pts allowed during 2 droughts (19.4% of 5-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Wisconsin Badgersvs Wisconsin BadgersL 75-78Jan 13
14 pts allowed during 1 drought (17.9% of 3-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Maryland Terrapinsvs Maryland TerrapinsL 62-67Feb 8
14 pts allowed during 3 droughts (20.9% of 5-pt margin)
Significant Factor
San Francisco Donsvs San Francisco DonsL 65-77Nov 22
13 pts allowed during 3 droughts (16.9% of 12-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Michigan Wolverines@ Michigan WolverinesL 67-77Feb 24
11 pts allowed during 1 drought (14.3% of 10-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Ohio State Buckeyes@ Ohio State BuckeyesL 74-82Jan 20
11 pts allowed during 1 drought (13.4% of 8-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Stanford Cardinalvs Stanford CardinalL 68-72Nov 27
10 pts allowed during 2 droughts (13.9% of 4-pt margin)
Significant Factor
USC Trojansvs USC TrojansL 69-70Jan 9
9 pts allowed during 2 droughts (12.9% of 1-pt margin)
Significant Factor

Drought killers

Players who most often ended Minnesota Golden Gophers scoring droughts in 2025-26.

1
CT
Cade Tyson
44% clutchⓘ
18
2
LR
Langston Reynolds
40% clutchⓘ
10
3
IA
Isaac Asuma
50% clutchⓘ
10
4
JC
Jaylen Crocker-Johnson
33% clutchⓘ
6
5
GG
Grayson Grove
100% clutchⓘ
5
6
BD
Bobby Durkin
50% clutchⓘ
4
7
RV
Robert Vaihola
2
8
KS
Kai Shinholster
2
3PT
2PT
FT