Leaderboards
Hofstra Pride

Hofstra Pride

Conference USAG5

2025-26 drought profile · 34 games played · 24-10 (71%)

Compare vs another team

Hofstra Pride ranks 2nd of 13 Conference USA teams in droughts per game (1.15 dpg, below the Conference USA average of 1.45). Their droughts average 3:54 (near the Conference USA norm) and have allowed opponents an average of 6.9 pts per drought, contributing to 5 influenced losses (2 decisive/major) in 2025-26.

Drought profile

1.15

Droughts/game

Conf avg: 1.4 · #2 of 13 in Conference USA

2nd in Conference USA

-0.30/game vs Conference USA avg

#2 in Conference USA (13 teams)

3:54

Avg duration

Conf avg: 3:55 · #7 of 13 in Conference USA

-0:01 vs Conference USA avg

How long cold streaks typically last

6.9

Avg drought cost

Conf avg: 7.3 · #3 of 13 in Conference USA

-0.4 pts vs Conference USA avg

Opponent points scored per drought

Game impact

5

Influenced losses

2 decisive/major: close losses where droughts swung the margin

31%

Timeout rate

Coach called a timeout in 12 of 39 droughts

6-4

Record w/ 2+ droughts

vs 18-6 in games with 0 to 1 droughts

Drought trend, 2025-26

Droughts per game over the season with a 3-game rolling average. Season average: 1.1 droughts/game.

When droughts happen

Shows when droughts begin in each 2-minute window throughout the game. Counts total to 39 droughts. Dashed line shows the conference average.

Half breakdown

1st half vs 2nd half: does this team adjust at halftime or get worse?

1st half
24
droughts · avg 3:52
2nd half
15
droughts · avg 3:57

Drought cost by severity

How damaging are each tier of drought? Longer droughts allow more opponent points. See if critical ones truly hurt more.

Notable (3–4 min)
26
67% of droughts
5.8 pts drought cost
Significant (4–5 min)
10
26% of droughts
8.8 pts drought cost
Critical (5+ min)
3
8% of droughts
10 pts drought cost

Avg. opponent points scored during drought

Notable (3–4 min)
5.8 pts
Significant (4–5 min)
8.8 pts
Critical (5+ min)
10 pts

Key takeaway

Critical droughts allow 72% more points than notable ones (10 vs 5.8 pts). Longer droughts cost significantly more.

Drought-ending shots

What shot finally breaks the cold streak? Zone intensity = frequency.

3-PT(26%)2-PT(62%)FT(13%)
3-pointer (10, 26%)2-pointer (24, 62%)FT (5, 13%)

Score differential by game

Every game plotted over 40 minutes: positive = team leading, negative = trailing. Hover a game in the sidebar to highlight its path through the season.

Mar 20
Alabama Crimson Tide@ Alabama Crimson Tide
L 70–90
Mar 10
Monmouth Hawksvs Monmouth Hawks
W 75–69
Mar 9
Towson Tigersvs Towson Tigers
W 68–65
Mar 8
William & Mary Tribevs William & Mary Tribe
W 92–61
Mar 3
Drexel Dragonsvs Drexel Dragons
W 62–51
Feb 28
Stony Brook Seawolvesvs Stony Brook Seawolves
W 67–58
Feb 21
Northeastern Huskies@ Northeastern Huskies
W 82–68
Feb 19
Hampton Piratesvs Hampton Pirates
W 79–43
Feb 14
UNC Wilmington Seahawks@ UNC Wilmington Seahawks
L 66–70
Feb 12
Charleston Cougars@ Charleston Cougars
W 66–62
Feb 7
Towson Tigersvs Towson Tigers
W 71–49
Feb 5
Northeastern Huskiesvs Northeastern Huskies
W 80–63
Jan 31
Monmouth Hawks@ Monmouth Hawks
W 73–57
Jan 29
Charleston Cougarsvs Charleston Cougars
L 64–66
Jan 24
William & Mary Tribe@ William & Mary Tribe
L 82–89
Jan 22
North Carolina A&T Aggies@ North Carolina A&T Aggies
L 78–79
Jan 17
Elon Phoenixvs Elon Phoenix
L 85–89
Jan 15
Stony Brook Seawolves@ Stony Brook Seawolves
L 71–76
Jan 10
Monmouth Hawksvs Monmouth Hawks
W 67–64
Jan 8
Towson Tigers@ Towson Tigers
W 78–67
Jan 3
Drexel Dragons@ Drexel Dragons
W 70–67
Dec 29
Campbell Fighting Camelsvs Campbell Fighting Camels
W 86–72
Dec 21
Quinnipiac Bobcatsvs Quinnipiac Bobcats
W 74–66
Dec 13
Syracuse Orange@ Syracuse Orange
W 70–69
Dec 10
vs Old Westbury Panthers
W 92–23
Dec 7
Pittsburgh Panthers@ Pittsburgh Panthers
W 80–73
Dec 3
Columbia Lions@ Columbia Lions
L 70–72
Nov 30
Pennsylvania Quakers@ Pennsylvania Quakers
W 77–60
Nov 29
Merrimack Warriorsvs Merrimack Warriors
W 78–58
Nov 28
La Salle Explorers@ La Salle Explorers
W 63–58
Nov 19
Temple Owls@ Temple Owls
L 76–81
Nov 14
Bucknell Bison@ Bucknell Bison
W 83–77
Nov 10
vs Molloy Lions
W 95–61
Nov 7
Iona Gaels@ Iona Gaels
L 73–81
← Opponent leading← Game time →Team leading →

Game log

Notable (3-4 min)Significant (4-5 min)Critical (5+ min)
DateOpponentScore (H-A)Droughts
Mar 20Alabama Crimson Tide@ Alabama Crimson TideL 90-70
4
Mar 10Monmouth Hawksvs Monmouth HawksW 75-690
Mar 9Towson Tigersvs Towson TigersW 68-65
2
Mar 8William & Mary Tribevs William & Mary TribeW 92-610
Mar 3Drexel Dragonsvs Drexel DragonsW 62-510
Feb 28Stony Brook Seawolvesvs Stony Brook SeawolvesW 67-58
3
Feb 21Northeastern Huskies@ Northeastern HuskiesW 68-82
1
Feb 19Hampton Piratesvs Hampton PiratesW 79-430
Feb 14UNC Wilmington Seahawks@ UNC Wilmington SeahawksL 70-66
1
Feb 12Charleston Cougars@ Charleston CougarsW 62-66
1
Feb 7Towson Tigersvs Towson TigersW 71-49
1
Feb 5Northeastern Huskiesvs Northeastern HuskiesW 80-630
Jan 31Monmouth Hawks@ Monmouth HawksW 57-730
Jan 29Charleston Cougarsvs Charleston CougarsL 64-66
3
Jan 24William & Mary Tribe@ William & Mary TribeL 89-82
1
Jan 22North Carolina A&T Aggies@ North Carolina A&T AggiesL 79-78
1
Jan 17Elon Phoenixvs Elon PhoenixL 85-890
Jan 15Stony Brook Seawolves@ Stony Brook SeawolvesL 76-71
3
Jan 10Monmouth Hawksvs Monmouth HawksW 67-64
4
Jan 8Towson Tigers@ Towson TigersW 67-780
Jan 3Drexel Dragons@ Drexel DragonsW 67-70
1
Dec 29Campbell Fighting Camelsvs Campbell Fighting CamelsW 86-72
2
Dec 21Quinnipiac Bobcatsvs Quinnipiac BobcatsW 74-66
1
Dec 13Syracuse Orange@ Syracuse OrangeW 69-70
2
Dec 10vs Old Westbury PanthersW 92-230
Dec 7Pittsburgh Panthers@ Pittsburgh PanthersW 73-800
Dec 3Columbia Lions@ Columbia LionsL 72-700
Nov 30Pennsylvania Quakers@ Pennsylvania QuakersW 60-770
Nov 29Merrimack Warriorsvs Merrimack WarriorsW 78-58
1
Nov 28La Salle Explorers@ La Salle ExplorersW 58-63
3
Nov 19Temple Owls@ Temple OwlsL 81-76
3
Nov 14Bucknell Bison@ Bucknell BisonW 77-830
Nov 10vs Molloy LionsW 95-610
Nov 7Iona Gaels@ Iona GaelsL 81-73
1

Drought-influenced losses

Close losses (≤15 pts) where droughts significantly impacted the outcome. "Drought cost" = points the opponent scores during a drought.

Stony Brook Seawolves@ Stony Brook SeawolvesL 71-76Jan 15
23 pts allowed during 3 droughts (30.3% of 5-pt margin)
Major Factor
Charleston Cougarsvs Charleston CougarsL 64-66Jan 29
22 pts allowed during 3 droughts (33.3% of 2-pt margin)
Major Factor
Temple Owls@ Temple OwlsL 76-81Nov 19
20 pts allowed during 3 droughts (24.7% of 5-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Iona Gaels@ Iona GaelsL 73-81Nov 7
17 pts allowed during 1 drought (21% of 8-pt margin)
Significant Factor
North Carolina A&T Aggies@ North Carolina A&T AggiesL 78-79Jan 22
13 pts allowed during 1 drought (16.5% of 1-pt margin)
Significant Factor

Drought killers

Players who most often ended Hofstra Pride scoring droughts in 2025-26.

1
CD
Cruz Davis
60% clutchⓘ
10
2
PE
Preston Edmead
56% clutchⓘ
9
3
VO
Victory Onuetu
86% clutchⓘ
7
4
BP
Biggie Patterson
60% clutchⓘ
5
5
GP
German Plotnikov
75% clutchⓘ
4
6
SS
Silas Sunday
2
7
JD
Joshua DeCady
2
3PT
2PT
FT