Leaderboards
Brown Bears

Brown Bears

Ivy LeagueOTHER

2025-26 drought profile · 27 games played · 9-18 (33%)

Compare vs another team

Brown Bears ranks 8th of 8 Ivy League teams in droughts per game (1.81 dpg, above the Ivy League average of 1.38). Their droughts average 4:00 (+0:10 above the Ivy League norm) and have allowed opponents an average of 6.8 pts per drought, contributing to 8 influenced losses (3 decisive/major) in 2025-26.

Drought profile

1.81

Droughts/game

Conf avg: 1.4 · #8 of 8 in Ivy League

8th in Ivy League

+0.43/game vs Ivy League avg

#8 in Ivy League (8 teams)

4:00

Avg duration

Conf avg: 3:52 · #7 of 8 in Ivy League

+0:10 vs Ivy League avg

How long cold streaks typically last

6.8

Avg drought cost

Conf avg: 7.0 · #4 of 8 in Ivy League

-0.1 pts vs Ivy League avg

Opponent points scored per drought

Game impact

8

Influenced losses

3 decisive/major: close losses where droughts swung the margin

37%

Timeout rate

Coach called a timeout in 18 of 49 droughts

2-11

Record w/ 2+ droughts

vs 7-7 in games with 0 to 1 droughts

Drought trend, 2025-26

Droughts per game over the season with a 3-game rolling average. Season average: 1.8 droughts/game.

When droughts happen

Shows when droughts begin in each 2-minute window throughout the game. Counts total to 49 droughts. Dashed line shows the conference average.

Half breakdown

1st half vs 2nd half: does this team adjust at halftime or get worse?

1st half
22
droughts · avg 4:04
2nd half
27
droughts · avg 3:57

Drought cost by severity

How damaging are each tier of drought? Longer droughts allow more opponent points. See if critical ones truly hurt more.

Notable (3–4 min)
30
61% of droughts
6 pts drought cost
Significant (4–5 min)
13
27% of droughts
8.2 pts drought cost
Critical (5+ min)
6
12% of droughts
8.3 pts drought cost

Avg. opponent points scored during drought

Notable (3–4 min)
6 pts
Significant (4–5 min)
8.2 pts
Critical (5+ min)
8.3 pts

Key takeaway

Critical droughts allow 38% more points than notable ones (8.3 vs 6 pts). Longer droughts cost significantly more.

Drought-ending shots

What shot finally breaks the cold streak? Zone intensity = frequency.

3-PT(27%)2-PT(61%)FT(12%)
3-pointer (13, 27%)2-pointer (30, 61%)FT (6, 12%)

Score differential by game

Every game plotted over 40 minutes: positive = team leading, negative = trailing. Hover a game in the sidebar to highlight its path through the season.

Mar 6
Pennsylvania Quakersvs Pennsylvania Quakers
L 61–82
Feb 28
Cornell Big Red@ Cornell Big Red
L 80–86
Feb 27
Columbia Lions@ Columbia Lions
L 62–80
Feb 20
Princeton Tigersvs Princeton Tigers
W 80–71
Feb 14
Dartmouth Big Green@ Dartmouth Big Green
W 79–76
Feb 13
Harvard Crimson@ Harvard Crimson
L 53–56
Feb 6
Yale Bulldogs@ Yale Bulldogs
L 69–81
Jan 31
Dartmouth Big Greenvs Dartmouth Big Green
L 70–77
Jan 30
Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard Crimson
L 59–69
Jan 24
Princeton Tigers@ Princeton Tigers
L 53–63
Jan 19
Cornell Big Redvs Cornell Big Red
L 67–89
Jan 17
Columbia Lionsvs Columbia Lions
W 86–80
Jan 10
Pennsylvania Quakers@ Pennsylvania Quakers
L 73–81
Jan 5
Yale Bulldogsvs Yale Bulldogs
L 53–70
Dec 31
vs Johnson & Wales (RI) Griffins
W 105–47
Dec 9
Providence Friars@ Providence Friars
L 79–86
Dec 6
vs Elms College Blazers
W 115–34
Dec 5
Bryant Bulldogsvs Bryant Bulldogs
W 75–56
Dec 2
Rhode Island Rams@ Rhode Island Rams
L 56–66
Nov 26
New Hampshire Wildcats@ New Hampshire Wildcats
W 59–47
Nov 23
Maine Black Bears@ Maine Black Bears
W 58–53
Nov 20
Stony Brook Seawolves@ Stony Brook Seawolves
L 70–80
Nov 18
Holy Cross Crusadersvs Holy Cross Crusaders
W 68–49
Nov 14
Hampton Piratesvs Hampton Pirates
L 63–72
Nov 12
Boston University Terriers@ Boston University Terriers
L 77–90
Nov 9
Vermont Catamountsvs Vermont Catamounts
L 84–89
Nov 7
Siena Saintsvs Siena Saints
L 46–62
← Opponent leading← Game time →Team leading →

Game log

Notable (3-4 min)Significant (4-5 min)Critical (5+ min)
DateOpponentScore (H-A)Droughts
Mar 6Pennsylvania Quakersvs Pennsylvania QuakersL 61-82
2
Feb 28Cornell Big Red@ Cornell Big RedL 86-80
1
Feb 27Columbia Lions@ Columbia LionsL 80-62
3
Feb 20Princeton Tigersvs Princeton TigersW 80-71
1
Feb 14Dartmouth Big Green@ Dartmouth Big GreenW 76-79
1
Feb 13Harvard Crimson@ Harvard CrimsonL 56-53
3
Feb 6Yale Bulldogs@ Yale BulldogsL 81-69
1
Jan 31Dartmouth Big Greenvs Dartmouth Big GreenL 70-77
1
Jan 30Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard CrimsonL 59-69
2
Jan 24Princeton Tigers@ Princeton TigersL 63-53
4
Jan 19Cornell Big Redvs Cornell Big RedL 67-89
3
Jan 17Columbia Lionsvs Columbia LionsW 86-80
1
Jan 10Pennsylvania Quakers@ Pennsylvania QuakersL 81-73
1
Jan 5Yale Bulldogsvs Yale BulldogsL 53-70
2
Dec 31vs Johnson & Wales (RI) GriffinsW 105-470
Dec 9Providence Friars@ Providence FriarsL 86-79
1
Dec 6vs Elms College BlazersW 115-340
Dec 5Bryant Bulldogsvs Bryant BulldogsW 75-56
3
Dec 2Rhode Island Rams@ Rhode Island RamsL 66-56
5
Nov 26New Hampshire Wildcats@ New Hampshire WildcatsW 47-59
1
Nov 23Maine Black Bears@ Maine Black BearsW 53-58
3
Nov 20Stony Brook Seawolves@ Stony Brook SeawolvesL 80-70
2
Nov 18Holy Cross Crusadersvs Holy Cross CrusadersW 68-49
1
Nov 14Hampton Piratesvs Hampton PiratesL 63-72
2
Nov 12Boston University Terriers@ Boston University TerriersL 90-77
1
Nov 9Vermont Catamountsvs Vermont CatamountsL 84-890
Nov 7Siena Saintsvs Siena SaintsL 46-62
4

Drought-influenced losses

Close losses (≤15 pts) where droughts significantly impacted the outcome. "Drought cost" = points the opponent scores during a drought.

Rhode Island Rams@ Rhode Island RamsL 56-66Dec 2
35 pts allowed during 5 droughts (53% of 10-pt margin)
Decisive Factor
Princeton Tigers@ Princeton TigersL 53-63Jan 24
25 pts allowed during 4 droughts (39.7% of 10-pt margin)
Major Factor
Harvard Crimson@ Harvard CrimsonL 53-56Feb 13
25 pts allowed during 3 droughts (44.6% of 3-pt margin)
Decisive Factor
Yale Bulldogs@ Yale BulldogsL 69-81Feb 6
15 pts allowed during 1 drought (18.5% of 12-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Stony Brook Seawolves@ Stony Brook SeawolvesL 70-80Nov 20
14 pts allowed during 2 droughts (17.5% of 10-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Cornell Big Red@ Cornell Big RedL 80-86Feb 28
11 pts allowed during 1 drought (12.8% of 6-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Hampton Piratesvs Hampton PiratesL 63-72Nov 14
11 pts allowed during 2 droughts (15.3% of 9-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard CrimsonL 59-69Jan 30
8 pts allowed during 2 droughts (11.6% of 10-pt margin)
Minor Factor

Drought killers

Players who most often ended Brown Bears scoring droughts in 2025-26.

1
AU
Adrian Uchidiuno
36% clutchⓘ
11
2
IL
Isaiah Langham
13% clutchⓘ
8
3
JJ
Jeremiah Jenkins
50% clutchⓘ
8
4
ND
N'famara Dabo
17% clutchⓘ
6
5
LL
Landon Lewis
40% clutchⓘ
5
6
MW
Malcolm Wrisby-Jefferson
0% clutchⓘ
5
7
DR
David Rochester
67% clutchⓘ
3
8
LP
Luke Paragon
2
3PT
2PT
FT