Leaderboards
Army Black Knights

Army Black Knights

PatriotOTHER

2025-26 drought profile · 31 games played · 10-21 (32%)

Compare vs another team

Army Black Knights ranks 10th of 10 Patriot teams in droughts per game (2.10 dpg, above the Patriot average of 1.61). Their droughts average 3:52 (near the Patriot norm) and have allowed opponents an average of 7.4 pts per drought, contributing to 13 influenced losses (6 decisive/major) in 2025-26.

Drought profile

2.10

Droughts/game

Conf avg: 1.7 · #10 of 10 in Patriot

10th in Patriot

+0.49/game vs Patriot avg

#10 in Patriot (10 teams)

3:52

Avg duration

Conf avg: 3:54 · #4 of 10 in Patriot

-0:02 vs Patriot avg

How long cold streaks typically last

7.4

Avg drought cost

Conf avg: 7.1 · #7 of 10 in Patriot

+0.4 pts vs Patriot avg

Opponent points scored per drought

Game impact

13

Influenced losses

6 decisive/major: close losses where droughts swung the margin

26%

Timeout rate

Coach called a timeout in 17 of 65 droughts

5-14

Record w/ 2+ droughts

vs 5-7 in games with 0 to 1 droughts

Drought trend, 2025-26

Droughts per game over the season with a 3-game rolling average. Season average: 2.1 droughts/game.

When droughts happen

Shows when droughts begin in each 2-minute window throughout the game. Counts total to 65 droughts. Dashed line shows the conference average.

Half breakdown

1st half vs 2nd half: does this team adjust at halftime or get worse?

1st half
37
droughts · avg 3:51
2nd half
28
droughts · avg 3:53

Drought cost by severity

How damaging are each tier of drought? Longer droughts allow more opponent points. See if critical ones truly hurt more.

Notable (3–4 min)
45
69% of droughts
6.3 pts drought cost
Significant (4–5 min)
14
22% of droughts
7.9 pts drought cost
Critical (5+ min)
6
9% of droughts
14.8 pts drought cost

Avg. opponent points scored during drought

Notable (3–4 min)
6.3 pts
Significant (4–5 min)
7.9 pts
Critical (5+ min)
14.8 pts

Key takeaway

Critical droughts allow 135% more points than notable ones (14.8 vs 6.3 pts). Longer droughts cost significantly more.

Drought-ending shots

What shot finally breaks the cold streak? Zone intensity = frequency.

3-PT(32%)2-PT(43%)FT(25%)
3-pointer (21, 32%)2-pointer (28, 43%)FT (16, 25%)

Score differential by game

Every game plotted over 40 minutes: positive = team leading, negative = trailing. Hover a game in the sidebar to highlight its path through the season.

Mar 3
Bucknell Bison@ Bucknell Bison
L 55–65
Feb 28
Lafayette Leopards@ Lafayette Leopards
L 77–83
Feb 25
Bucknell Bisonvs Bucknell Bison
L 73–75
Feb 21
Navy Midshipmenvs Navy Midshipmen
L 63–81
Feb 18
Loyola Maryland Greyhounds@ Loyola Maryland Greyhounds
W 87–77
Feb 14
American University Eagles@ American University Eagles
L 63–75
Feb 11
Boston University Terriersvs Boston University Terriers
L 68–85
Feb 7
Lafayette Leopardsvs Lafayette Leopards
L 60–63
Feb 4
Colgate Raiders@ Colgate Raiders
L 55–69
Jan 31
Holy Cross Crusadersvs Holy Cross Crusaders
W 69–68
Jan 28
Lehigh Mountain Hawksvs Lehigh Mountain Hawks
W 67–64
Jan 24
Navy Midshipmen@ Navy Midshipmen
L 56–84
Jan 21
Bucknell Bison@ Bucknell Bison
W 87–84
Jan 18
American University Eaglesvs American University Eagles
L 67–78
Jan 14
Holy Cross Crusaders@ Holy Cross Crusaders
L 75–82
Jan 10
Boston University Terriers@ Boston University Terriers
L 91–100
Jan 7
Loyola Maryland Greyhoundsvs Loyola Maryland Greyhounds
L 76–84
Jan 3
Colgate Raidersvs Colgate Raiders
L 69–76
Dec 31
Lehigh Mountain Hawks@ Lehigh Mountain Hawks
W 85–78
Dec 23
Binghamton Bearcatsvs Binghamton Bearcats
W 95–85
Dec 12
UMBC Retrievers@ UMBC Retrievers
W 63–60
Dec 7
vs Gallaudet Bison
W 111–53
Dec 2
George Washington Revolutionariesvs George Washington Revolutionaries
L 70–84
Nov 29
Manhattan Jaspersvs Manhattan Jaspers
W 81–78
Nov 26
Fairleigh Dickinson Knights@ Fairleigh Dickinson Knights
W 81–73
Nov 25
East Texas A&M Lionsvs East Texas A&M Lions
L 67–84
Nov 21
Marist Red Foxes@ Marist Red Foxes
L 65–76
Nov 18
Cornell Big Red@ Cornell Big Red
L 73–86
Nov 15
Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard Crimson
L 52–75
Nov 11
Duke Blue Devilsvs Duke Blue Devils
L 59–114
Nov 8
St. Thomas-Minnesota Tommies@ St. Thomas-Minnesota Tommies
L 76–83
← Opponent leading← Game time →Team leading →

Game log

Notable (3-4 min)Significant (4-5 min)Critical (5+ min)
DateOpponentScore (H-A)Droughts
Mar 3Bucknell Bison@ Bucknell BisonL 65-55
4
Feb 28Lafayette Leopards@ Lafayette LeopardsL 83-77
4
Feb 25Bucknell Bisonvs Bucknell BisonL 73-75
4
Feb 21Navy Midshipmenvs Navy MidshipmenL 63-81
3
Feb 18Loyola Maryland Greyhounds@ Loyola Maryland GreyhoundsW 77-870
Feb 14American University Eagles@ American University EaglesL 75-63
4
Feb 11Boston University Terriersvs Boston University TerriersL 68-85
3
Feb 7Lafayette Leopardsvs Lafayette LeopardsL 60-63
1
Feb 4Colgate Raiders@ Colgate RaidersL 69-55
1
Jan 31Holy Cross Crusadersvs Holy Cross CrusadersW 69-68
3
Jan 28Lehigh Mountain Hawksvs Lehigh Mountain HawksW 67-640
Jan 24Navy Midshipmen@ Navy MidshipmenL 84-56
1
Jan 21Bucknell Bison@ Bucknell BisonW 84-87
1
Jan 18American University Eaglesvs American University EaglesL 67-78
3
Jan 14Holy Cross Crusaders@ Holy Cross CrusadersL 82-75
2
Jan 10Boston University Terriers@ Boston University TerriersL 100-910
Jan 7Loyola Maryland Greyhoundsvs Loyola Maryland GreyhoundsL 76-84
2
Jan 3Colgate Raidersvs Colgate RaidersL 69-76
1
Dec 31Lehigh Mountain Hawks@ Lehigh Mountain HawksW 78-85
1
Dec 23Binghamton Bearcatsvs Binghamton BearcatsW 95-85
2
Dec 12UMBC Retrievers@ UMBC RetrieversW 60-63
3
Dec 7vs Gallaudet BisonW 111-53
1
Dec 2George Washington Revolutionariesvs George Washington RevolutionariesL 70-840
Nov 29Manhattan Jaspersvs Manhattan JaspersW 81-78
4
Nov 26Fairleigh Dickinson Knights@ Fairleigh Dickinson KnightsW 73-81
2
Nov 25East Texas A&M Lionsvs East Texas A&M LionsL 67-84
3
Nov 21Marist Red Foxes@ Marist Red FoxesL 76-65
4
Nov 18Cornell Big Red@ Cornell Big RedL 86-73
2
Nov 15Harvard Crimsonvs Harvard CrimsonL 52-75
2
Nov 11Duke Blue Devilsvs Duke Blue DevilsL 59-114
3
Nov 8St. Thomas-Minnesota Tommies@ St. Thomas-Minnesota TommiesL 83-76
1

Drought-influenced losses

Close losses (≤15 pts) where droughts significantly impacted the outcome. "Drought cost" = points the opponent scores during a drought.

Bucknell Bisonvs Bucknell BisonL 73-75Feb 25
31 pts allowed during 4 droughts (41.3% of 2-pt margin)
Decisive Factor
Bucknell Bison@ Bucknell BisonL 55-65Mar 3
30 pts allowed during 4 droughts (46.2% of 10-pt margin)
Decisive Factor
Lafayette Leopards@ Lafayette LeopardsL 77-83Feb 28
28 pts allowed during 4 droughts (33.7% of 6-pt margin)
Major Factor
Marist Red Foxes@ Marist Red FoxesL 65-76Nov 21
22 pts allowed during 4 droughts (28.9% of 11-pt margin)
Major Factor
Colgate Raiders@ Colgate RaidersL 55-69Feb 4
22 pts allowed during 1 drought (31.9% of 14-pt margin)
Major Factor
American University Eagles@ American University EaglesL 63-75Feb 14
21 pts allowed during 4 droughts (28% of 12-pt margin)
Major Factor
St. Thomas-Minnesota Tommies@ St. Thomas-Minnesota TommiesL 76-83Nov 8
17 pts allowed during 1 drought (20.5% of 7-pt margin)
Significant Factor
American University Eaglesvs American University EaglesL 67-78Jan 18
15 pts allowed during 3 droughts (19.2% of 11-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Holy Cross Crusaders@ Holy Cross CrusadersL 75-82Jan 14
14 pts allowed during 2 droughts (17.1% of 7-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Loyola Maryland Greyhoundsvs Loyola Maryland GreyhoundsL 76-84Jan 7
12 pts allowed during 2 droughts (14.3% of 8-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Lafayette Leopardsvs Lafayette LeopardsL 60-63Feb 7
12 pts allowed during 1 drought (19% of 3-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Colgate Raidersvs Colgate RaidersL 69-76Jan 3
11 pts allowed during 1 drought (14.5% of 7-pt margin)
Significant Factor
Cornell Big Red@ Cornell Big RedL 73-86Nov 18
10 pts allowed during 2 droughts (11.6% of 13-pt margin)
Minor Factor

Drought killers

Players who most often ended Army Black Knights scoring droughts in 2025-26.

1
JH
Jacen Holloway
20% clutchⓘ
15
2
JB
Jaxson Bell
45% clutchⓘ
11
3
RC
Ryan Curry
14% clutchⓘ
7
4
KM
Kevin McCarthy
33% clutchⓘ
6
5
JF
Jackson Furman
17% clutchⓘ
6
6
JE
Jorn Everson
33% clutchⓘ
6
7
TL
Tate Laczkowski
20% clutchⓘ
5
8
JE
Joshua Eli
75% clutchⓘ
4
9
DB
Dylan Benner
2
3PT
2PT
FT